Monopoly: who owns the world? 2019 documentary

Checked on January 12, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

"Monopoly: Who Owns the World?" is presented in multiple listings as an independent documentary that argues institutional investment firms sit at the apex of a global corporate pyramid and exert outsized influence over everyday life [1] [2] [3]. Distribution and metadata for the film are fragmented across independent streaming platforms and aggregator listings, and it is sometimes conflated with other titles called "Monopoly," creating ambiguity about release date and credits in the available reporting [4] [5] [6].

1. What the documentary claims and emphasizes

The film markets itself as an exposé of concentrated corporate power, spotlighting institutional investment firms and "globalists" who, the producers argue, control large swaths of the economy and therefore daily life, from food and medicine to communication and apparel [1] [2]. Promotional descriptions and one hosting platform frame the documentary as revealing that "the majority of our world is owned by the very same people," a claim used to dramatize the idea that a small set of entities can impose agendas globally [7]. The focus in the sources is on mapping ownership ties and presenting a narrative of a layered, opaque corporate pyramid dominated by institutional investors [1] [3].

2. Production, authorship and distribution — messy trail

Multiple listings identify the filmmaker as Tim Geilen or Tim Gielen and label the piece an independent documentary, but sources disagree on details and dates: aggregator and promotional pages list the documentary under 2021, while an unrelated IMDb entry for a different "Monopoly" title shows a 2019 French release and different genre metadata, which can create confusion for viewers trying to locate definitive credits [1] [4] [5]. The film appears on a variety of non-mainstream platforms and video hosts — Rumble, Dailymotion, BitChute — and is listed on streaming guides such as TV Guide and Binged, indicating a distribution path focused on independent and alternative channels rather than the major festival-to-streaming pipeline [8] [5] [7] [6].

3. Evidence and sourcing — what's visible in the reporting

Available descriptions emphasize visualizing corporate ownership networks and naming large institutional investors but the reporting provided does not include verbatim interview lists, archival sources, or citations shown in the film itself, so the precise documentary evidence cannot be confirmed from these listings alone [1] [2] [3]. Promotional and host-site language characterizes the film as "eye-opening" and alleges concentrated control, signaling a persuasive, activist tone rather than a neutral inventory of data points in the materials available [7] [2]. Because the provided sources are largely platform listings and promotional write-ups, they do not allow verification of the documentary’s methodology or the accuracy of specific ownership claims [8] [1].

4. Reception, context and competing narratives

The documentary sits within a broader genre of films that scrutinize corporate power; mainstream, credentialed documentaries about related topics exist and are catalogued under the same "Monopoly" keyword space, such as an Emmy-winning film about the Monopoly board game, which highlights how the title overlap can mislead audiences [9]. The materials supplied contain mostly independent-site enthusiasm and some alarmist wording [7], but do not include mainstream critical reviews, academic responses, or investigative follow-ups in the sources provided, so balanced reception analysis is not possible from this dataset alone [6] [3].

5. What can and cannot be concluded from the available reporting

From the reporting supplied, it is supportable to conclude that an independently produced film titled "Monopoly: Who Owns the World?" presents an argument that institutional investors occupy dominant positions in global corporate ownership and that the film is distributed across independent video platforms and listed by streaming guides [1] [8] [6]. What cannot be determined from these sources is the documentary’s evidentiary rigor, the exact roster of interviewees, whether its core ownership claims withstand independent audit, or how it is evaluated by mainstream critics — those details are not present in the provided listings [1] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Who are the major institutional investors often named in ownership-network analyses and what holdings do they commonly control?
How do investigative journalists trace corporate ownership through subsidiaries and investment vehicles?
What mainstream documentaries and academic studies analyze corporate concentration and institutional investor influence?