Fact check: How many people attended No Kings events

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, No Kings events drew significant crowds across multiple states with varying attendance figures depending on location and scale. The data shows:

Regional Attendance Figures:

• North Dakota and Minnesota events (June 15, 2025): Grand Forks saw 800-1,000 attendees, while Jamestown had 181 participants ^[1]. Minnesota locations showed larger turnouts with Duluth drawing thousands, Rochester attracting 2,500-3,000 people, and Bemidji hosting approximately 1,000 attendees ^{[1] [2]}.
• Smaller Minnesota communities also participated with varying scales: St. Cloud had hundreds to thousands, Brainerd saw hundreds, Willmar hosted 500, Perham had 150, and Superior drew 700 participants ^{[1] [2]}.
• Oklahoma City event represented one of the largest single gatherings with an estimated 8,500-10,000 attendees ^[3].

National Scale: The movement achieved remarkable reach with over 5 million people participating across more than 2,100 rallies and protests throughout the United States ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about the scope and nature of the No Kings movement. The analyses reveal this was a coordinated national protest movement rather than isolated local events, but several key details remain unclear:

• The specific cause or political issue driving these protests is not identified in any source
• Organizational structure behind coordinating 2,100+ simultaneous events nationwide
• Timeline and duration of the protest movement beyond the June 15-16, 2025 dates
• Geographic distribution - while Midwest locations are well-documented, the national scope suggests events occurred in regions not covered by these sources
• Demographic composition of attendees and their motivations for participating

Alternative perspectives that could benefit from promoting or downplaying these attendance figures include:

• Political organizations seeking to demonstrate grassroots support or opposition momentum
• Media outlets that might emphasize or minimize crowd sizes based on editorial stance
• Local authorities who may have interests in either showcasing peaceful assembly or highlighting security concerns

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears neutral and factual in seeking attendance information without making claims about the events' significance or impact. However, the question's lack of specificity could lead to incomplete or misleading responses:

• No timeframe specified - the movement appears to have occurred over multiple days with varying attendance
• No geographic scope indicated - attendance varied dramatically by location from 150 in Perham to 10,000 in Oklahoma City
• No distinction between individual events and cumulative totals - the 5 million figure represents nationwide participation while local events had much smaller crowds

The sources themselves show consistent reporting patterns with overlapping coverage between regional outlets ^{[1] [2]} and appear to provide credible attendance estimates rather than inflated or deflated figures, suggesting minimal bias in the underlying data.