Has Oprah Winfrey promoted Prozenith on her media channels?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
No, Oprah Winfrey has not promoted Prozenith on her media channels. The evidence overwhelmingly shows that Oprah's name and likeness are being used fraudulently to promote weight loss products, including Prozenith, without her consent [1].
Oprah has explicitly warned fans against falling victim to companies selling weight loss products using her name and image [2]. She specifically denies endorsing weight loss gummies or diet pills [2]. The scam involves AI-generated deepfake videos of Oprah praising weight loss products like the "pink salt trick" recipe, which are completely fabricated [3] [4].
A concrete example demonstrates the fraud: a Utah woman paid over $400 for a supplement she believed was endorsed by Oprah, but it turned out to be a common spice [1]. This illustrates how scammers exploit Oprah's trusted reputation to sell overpriced, ineffective products.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial context about the widespread nature of celebrity endorsement fraud in the weight loss industry. Scammers systematically use celebrity testimonials to promote "miracle" health products [5], with Oprah being a particularly targeted figure due to her influence and credibility.
The financial incentives driving this fraud are substantial. Companies benefit enormously from falsely associating their products with Oprah's brand, as demonstrated by the Utah woman's $400 purchase [1]. These scammers exploit AI technology to create convincing deepfake videos that make celebrities appear to endorse products they've never heard of [3] [4].
Oprah does have legitimate business partnerships - she has a partnership with WW International, formerly known as Weight Watchers [2] - which makes the fraudulent endorsements more believable to consumers who know she has been involved in weight-related businesses.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself is problematic because it assumes the possibility that Oprah might have promoted Prozenith, when the evidence clearly shows this is part of an ongoing scam operation. The question inadvertently legitimizes fraudulent claims by treating them as potentially credible.
The question fails to acknowledge the established pattern of celebrity endorsement fraud that specifically targets Oprah's reputation [1] [2] [5]. By asking whether she "promoted" Prozenith rather than whether scammers are using her name fraudulently, the question misframes the issue entirely.
This framing could inadvertently spread misinformation by suggesting there's legitimate debate about Oprah's involvement with Prozenith, when the reality is that her name is being used without consent in a documented scam operation [1] [2].