Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How has mainstream film and TV depicted pegging in the last decade and has that changed by 2025?
Executive summary
Mainstream film and TV have shown more visible pegging scenes since the mid-2010s, with critics noting a shift from allusion to frank, comic, or normalized depiction [1]. Niche lists and fan sites catalog repeated examples through the 2020s, while specialty platforms and aggregators highlight both mainstream references and explicit porn/indie works that center pegging [2] [3] [4].
1. Pegging moved from wink-and-allude to on-screen moments
Journalists writing about 2015 called that year a turning point where strap-on sex stopped being only a hinted-at punchline and started appearing as frank, funny, or sexy on-screen moments — for example coverage citing Broad City and other shows — marking a move away from representing it solely as deviant [1].
2. Concrete mainstream examples surfaced repeatedly
Compilations and pop-culture roundups collected a number of recognizable moments: lists of "16 times" or "top five" pegging scenes document appearances in shows and films such as Broad City and Deadpool, indicating mainstream productions have not uniformly shied away from including pegging in narrative or comedic contexts [2] [5] [6].
3. Two dominant tones: comedy/normalization vs. titillation
Sources show pegging in mainstream outlets often appears in two registers. Vulture argued shows treated strap-on scenes in frank, funny, or sexy ways rather than as deviant [1]. Entertainment sites and fetish-oriented lists, however, present pegging as erotic content to be consumed for arousal, which frames those same scenes differently [5] [7].
4. Cataloguing and searchability grew — evidence of cultural curiosity
IMDb keyword tagging and curated pages catalog "pegging" across many titles, suggesting increased visibility and audience interest; the keyword set includes associated tags like "strap on dildo" and "anal sex," implying the phenomenon is searchable and noticed by viewers and databases [3]. Dedicated articles and watchlists (e.g., "Netflix shows to tell them you're into pegging") further show cultural curiosity and attempts to normalize conversation [6].
5. Mainstream vs. niche: explicitness still segregated
While mainstream productions have shown pegging scenes, explicit depictions and work that centers pegging remain largely on porn and specialty platforms. PinkLabel and other niche distributors catalogue explicit pegging content and indie/ethical porn that foregrounds it, separate from mainstream narrative films and TV [4]. General entertainment coverage tends toward comedic or suggestive portrayals rather than explicit pornographic depiction [2] [1].
6. Tone and intent vary by outlet — agenda and framing matter
Commercial and culture outlets (Vulture, mainstream lists) frame pegging as a sign of evolving sexual representation or as comic device [1]. Fetish- or erotica-focused sites treat scenes as titillation or "hottest moments" [5]. Fan compilations and niche watchlists sometimes serve dual purposes: cataloguing and encouraging viewership, which blurs editorial neutrality [2] [8].
7. Has the depiction changed by 2025? Evidence of gradual normalization, but limited mainstream scholarship
Recent pieces from 2024–2025 continue to list pegging moments and argue for a transition from taboo toward mainstream visibility [2] [8]. Databases and streaming recommendations reflect persistent interest [3] [6]. However, available sources do not offer comprehensive academic studies or industry-level data showing how frequent or influential these depictions became by 2025 — reporting remains list-driven and descriptive rather than quantitatively conclusive (not found in current reporting).
8. What the coverage leaves out and why that matters
Mainstream coverage catalogs scenes and frames cultural meaning, but it rarely addresses audience demographics, industry decision-making, or measurable social impact; niche platforms fill the gap with explicit catalogs and sales-oriented framing [4] [5]. The editorial perspective matters: outlets with erotic intent will emphasize arousal and selection bias, while cultural critics emphasize normalization — readers should weigh both when assessing change [1] [5].
9. Bottom line for readers curious about trend and representation
If you measure change by visibility and willingness to depict pegging on-screen, reporting from mid-2010s onward shows clear increases in moments treated humorously, casually, or as part of sexual exploration [1] [2]. If you measure change by mainstream explicitness or by rigorous studies of impact, available reporting does not provide that evidence and instead relies on curated lists, IMDb keyword traces, and niche catalogs [3] [4].
Sources cited in this piece: Vulture coverage of 2015 as a notable year for strap-on representation [1]; FemDom U and similar compilations listing modern pegging scenes [2]; IMDb keyword indexing showing pegging as a searchable tag [3]; PinkLabel and niche distributors cataloguing explicit pegging content [4]; erotica and watchlist pieces highlighting mainstream and streaming examples [5] [6].