Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Films and television often fail to convey just how loud firearms are in real life.

Checked on January 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement is strongly supported by multiple sources, but requires important context. Real firearms produce sounds ranging from 140-190 decibels [1], which is significantly different from media portrayals. Even weapons with suppressors remain dangerously loud, contrary to Hollywood depictions of "silent" weapons [2]. In real-life situations, a single gunshot in an enclosed space can cause permanent hearing damage [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:

  • Intentional Hollywood Sound Design: Movie gunshot sounds are deliberately created through post-production techniques called "Foley" [4]. Sound designers intentionally prioritize emotional impact and audience engagement over acoustic accuracy [5].
  • Historical Evolution: Older films used different techniques like blackpowder blanks, which produced softer sounds compared to modern methods [4].
  • Real-world Examples: A veteran's testimony reveals that some weapons, like the M-79 grenade launcher, actually make less dramatic sounds in reality ("wimpy plink") compared to their Hollywood counterparts [6].
  • Technical Details: Real gunshots are described as "abrupt and overpowering" rather than the "distinct, crisp sound" portrayed in media [7].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

While the original statement is fundamentally accurate, it doesn't acknowledge that:

  • Entertainment Industry Priorities: The entertainment industry deliberately chooses unrealistic sound effects for artistic and dramatic purposes [5]. This isn't necessarily misinformation but rather an artistic choice.
  • Safety Implications: The statement doesn't address the serious safety concerns, such as the need for ear protection which is often absent in media portrayals [3].
  • Beneficiaries of Misconceptions: The entertainment industry benefits from these unrealistic portrayals as they create more dramatic and engaging content [5]. This artistic license has contributed to widespread public misconceptions about firearm acoustics and safety.
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?