Are rob reiner and wife going for autopsy

1. What the official coverage says about the deaths

News outlets report that Rob Reiner, 78, and his wife Michele, 68, were found dead in their Los Angeles home and that the Los Angeles Police Department’s robbery-homicide detectives are treating the matter as an “apparent homicide” ^[1]. AP, BBC and other major outlets describe police activity at the home and confirm that detectives are investigating the scene; the reporting notes the couple were discovered after a medical-aid call and that authorities have provided limited public detail about the cause pending investigation ^{[2] [4] [1]}.

2. Arrest and charging developments that overshadow an autopsy question

Multiple outlets state the couple’s son, Nick Reiner, was arrested in connection with their deaths and that prosecutors are moving to file murder charges — including first-degree counts — against him; public attention in these reports focuses on the arrest, the charges and courtroom steps rather than on any family statement about pursuing (or declining) an autopsy ^{[3] [4] [5]}.

3. What mainstream reporters describe about cause-of-death handling

Several outlets report wounds consistent with a knife attack and cite law-enforcement or coroner sources for that detail, indicating an ongoing forensic investigation; such reporting implies coroner/medical examiner involvement, which in homicide investigations normally includes autopsy procedures, although the stories do not quote the coroner saying an autopsy was or was not performed ^{[1] [6] [7]}. Available sources do not explicitly state whether the coroner has completed an autopsy or whether the family requested one ^{[1] [7]}.

4. Why people may be asking “Are they going for autopsy?”

Public curiosity about autopsies often rises in high-profile deaths, particularly when initial coverage mentions “homicide,” arrests and limited release of official details; some outlets report stab wounds and blood at related locations, which fuels demand for forensic confirmation of cause and manner of death ^{[6] [7]}. At the same time, the dominant news thread is criminal charging and procedure, not family decisions about autopsy publicity ^{[3] [4]}.

5. Competing perspectives and possible misinformation

Tabloid outlets and partisan sites have amplified graphic or speculative details — for example, claims about blood in a hotel room tied to the son — that other outlets attribute to unnamed law-enforcement sources; mainstream outlets report those claims but distinguish them from confirmed coroner findings ^{[7] [6]}. Conspiracy framing around motive — including political spin from public figures — has been publicly pushed and rebutted in the press; reporting shows prosecutors and police are following evidence and have not publicly tied motive to politics ^{[8] [9] [10]}.

6. What the sources do and do not report — limitations

Reporting cites homicide investigation status, an arrest and impending charges, and references to wounds consistent with stabbing, but none of the provided stories publish a formal coroner report or state that an autopsy has been publicly released. Thus: available sources do not mention a family-announced plan “to go for an autopsy,” and they do not publish final forensic results attributed to the coroner at this time ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

7. Takeaway for readers seeking confirmed forensic facts

Expect official forensic conclusions to come through the Los Angeles County medical examiner or prosecution filings; for now, credible national outlets emphasize criminal charges and police investigation rather than a public family decision about autopsy. To verify whether an autopsy has been completed or its findings released, follow direct statements from the LA coroner or the district attorney, as cited in evolving coverage ^{[2] [4]}.

Sources cited above: The Guardian, AP, Fox News, BBC, TMZ, NY Daily News and aggregated coverage in major outlets cited in this dossier ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]}.