Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Did Simone Biles respond to Charlie Kirk's apology or comments?

Checked on September 19, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses from various sources, including [1], [2], and [3], confirm that Simone Biles did not write a blog post about Charlie Kirk [1]. Additionally, sources [2] and [3] report that Simone Biles did not mock Charlie Kirk's death in a blog post, and that any claims suggesting otherwise are false [2]. Furthermore, sources [3], [1], and [2] also confirm that Simone Biles did not respond to Charlie Kirk's apology or comments, and that a viral Facebook post claiming she wrote a blog about him is fake [3]. The consensus among the sources is that Simone Biles has not commented on Charlie Kirk's death, and that any reports suggesting otherwise are false [3]. Sources [2], [3], and [4] also support this conclusion, stating that the claim of Simone Biles writing a blog about Charlie Kirk is a result of AI-generated misinformation on Facebook [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key point missing from the original statement is the context of Charlie Kirk's death and how it relates to Simone Biles [1]. The sources do not provide information on whether Charlie Kirk had made any comments or apologies that would have prompted a response from Simone Biles [1]. Additionally, the sources do not offer alternative viewpoints on why the false claim of Simone Biles writing a blog about Charlie Kirk may have originated or spread [3]. It is also worth noting that the sources primarily focus on debunking the false claim, rather than exploring the potential motivations or implications of the claim [3]. Furthermore, the role of social media in spreading misinformation is highlighted in several sources, including [1] and [4], but the original statement does not address this aspect.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or incomplete, as it does not provide context about Charlie Kirk's death or the nature of the apology or comments that Simone Biles allegedly responded to [3]. The sources suggest that the claim of Simone Biles writing a blog about Charlie Kirk is entirely false, and that Simone Biles has not commented on Charlie Kirk's death [2]. The original statement may benefit those who seek to spread misinformation or create controversy, as it does not provide a clear or accurate representation of the situation [2]. On the other hand, fact-checking sources and journalists may benefit from the original statement, as it provides an opportunity to correct misinformation and provide accurate information [3]. Ultimately, the public may be the primary beneficiary of accurate information, as it allows them to make informed decisions and avoid spreading misinformation [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What were Charlie Kirk's comments about Simone Biles that sparked controversy?
Has Simone Biles publicly addressed Charlie Kirk's apology?
How did the gymnastics community react to Charlie Kirk's comments about Simone Biles?
What is Charlie Kirk's history of making comments about athletes and sports?
Did Simone Biles' response to Charlie Kirk's comments spark a wider conversation about athlete criticism?