Are there examples of other Strictly contestants who started with no prior dance experience and reached the final?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Yes — there are documented cases of Strictly Come Dancing finalists who began the series with little or no recorded dance background: social-media star George Clarke is explicitly described in reporting as having "zero previous dance experience" yet made the 2025 final (Express; BBC) [1] [2]. At the same time, the show regularly produces tension between “beginner” underdog narratives and complaints about contestants with prior training, and reporting shows both patterns across series (Guardian; TVTropes) [3] [4].
1. A clear, recent example: George Clarke’s no-experience-to-final story
Contemporary reporting on the 2025 series singles out George Clarke as a finalist who began with no prior dance experience: an Express story quotes viewers describing him as “the only contestant with ZERO previous dance experience” as he danced in the final, and BBC coverage lists him among the three 2025 finalists alongside Karen Carney and Amber Davies [1] [2]. Those two elements together — the explicit “zero experience” line in the Express piece and the BBC’s confirmation of his finalist status — make Clarke a straightforward example of a non-dancer reaching the show’s climax [1] [2].
2. The precedent of surprise winners and underdogs
Broad press coverage has framed the show as capable of producing surprise success stories: the BBC noted viewers “value an element of surprise” and cited the recent example of Chris McCausland, who won the previous year and became emblematic of an unexpected triumph on Strictly [2]. Reporting like this is often used to argue that the format rewards charisma, improvement and public voting as much as prior technical skill, though specific articles do not always detail contestants’ exact levels of pre-show training [2].
3. Frequent pushback over “ringers” and prior experience
Alongside underdog stories, reporting repeatedly documents backlash when contestants are perceived to have significant pre-existing dance skills. Guardian and other outlets noted that finalists or high scorers have sometimes been accused of being “ringers” with substantial prior experience — Amber Davies in 2025, for example, faced online scrutiny over suggestions she had a dance background even as she topped judges’ scores [3] [5]. TVTropes’ long-running summary of the show also flags a recurring trope: celebrities with prior dance training can be unpopular with viewers and may be treated as “too qualified to apply” [4]. Those patterns show the show’s double dynamic: both genuine novices can succeed, and perceived pre-trained contestants invite controversy.
4. What the sources do — and don’t — allow journalists to say
The supplied reporting enables a firm, sourced claim that George Clarke reached the 2025 final despite being described in at least one outlet as having had no previous dance experience [1] [2]. The sources also document other finalists who generated debate about prior training (Amber Davies; Rose Ayling‑Ellis and JB Gill earlier being flagged in press as having prior experience) but do not consistently catalogue every finalist’s exact pre-show dance CV; therefore it would be incorrect to assert comprehensively, from these sources alone, which past finalists were absolute true beginners versus those with modest prior training unless each case is supported by reporting [6] [7] [5].
5. The bigger picture: format, voting and narrative matter as much as experience
Taken together, the reporting paints a programme where raw experience is only one factor in who reaches the final: judges’ scores, viewer voting, compelling improvement arcs and public narratives about overcoming obstacles all influence outcomes, enabling some participants with little or no dance background to progress far while also provoking criticism when a contestant is seen as having an unfair head start [2] [3] [4]. The documented example of George Clarke in 2025 provides concrete support for the proposition that Strictly finalists can and do sometimes start with no prior dance experience — but the sources also make clear that the line between “no experience” and “some prior training” is frequently contested in public debate [1] [3] [4].