Fact check: Suicide Squad Kill the Justice league was a dogshit game, with dogshit mechanics and a dogshit story. Of course, none of this should be a surprise as a dogshit company Sweet Baby Inc was involved.

1. Summary of the results

The game indeed faced significant challenges and was poorly received, though the original statement's harsh language oversimplifies a complex situation. Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League was developed by Rocksteady Studios as a genre-bending action-adventure shooter ^[1], but ultimately resulted in a $200 million revenue loss for Warner Bros. ^[2]. The game received widespread criticism for its repetitive gameplay, lackluster story, and was considered "doomed to fail" by some critics ^[3]. A particularly controversial aspect was the ending, which revealed that the Justice League members were actually clones - a twist delivered through a brief animated comic that left many players dissatisfied ^{[4] [5] [6]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement's criticism of Sweet Baby Inc. requires important context:

• Sweet Baby Inc. is primarily a narrative consultation company that works with major game studios in a consulting capacity, not as full game developers ^[7]
• Their role typically involves "finetuning" narrative coherence, similar to book editors, rather than complete story creation ^[8]
• The game's development faced multiple challenges beyond narrative issues, including:
• Live service elements that were poorly received ^[5]
• Development controversies ^[3]
• Subsequent layoffs at Rocksteady Studios ^[2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

Several aspects of the original statement show potential bias or oversimplification:

• The statement incorrectly attributes the game's failure entirely to Sweet Baby Inc., when they were only consultants on the project ^[7]
• While some sources are highly critical of Sweet Baby Inc.'s involvement, these sources show clear editorial bias ^[9]
• The statement ignores the complex development process and multiple factors contributing to the game's poor reception, including:
• Live service implementation issues ^[6]
• The controversial clone storyline twist ^{[4] [5]}
• Overall development troubles at Rocksteady Studios ^[2]

The reality appears to be that while the game was indeed poorly received and commercially unsuccessful, attributing its failure to a single consulting company oversimplifies a complex development situation involving multiple stakeholders and challenges.