Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Has Taylor Swift publicly responded to Charlie Kirk's comments?

Checked on September 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses from various sources, including [1], [5], and [4], suggest that Taylor Swift has not publicly responded to Charlie Kirk's comments about her engagement to Travis Kelce [1]. The sources, such as [3] and [2], report that Charlie Kirk made sexist comments about Taylor Swift's engagement, advising young women to get married like Swift [2]. Additionally, sources like [3] and [5] confirm that Taylor Swift remains silent on the matter, despite the controversy surrounding Kirk's statements [3]. The sources, including [4] and [4], also provide more context about Kirk's remarks and the public backlash he faced [4]. Key points from the analyses include the fact that Charlie Kirk's comments were deemed demeaning to Taylor Swift's career [4] and that his post about Swift's engagement sparked outrage among fans [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources, such as [1] and [5], do not provide explicit statements from Taylor Swift or her representatives regarding Charlie Kirk's comments [1]. Furthermore, sources like [3] and [3] do not offer alternative perspectives on why Taylor Swift might not have responded publicly to Charlie Kirk's comments [3]. It is also worth noting that the sources, including [4] and [5], do not provide direct quotes from Taylor Swift or Travis Kelce regarding the controversy [4]. Alternative viewpoints that could be considered include the possibility that Taylor Swift might be choosing not to engage with Charlie Kirk's comments in order to avoid giving him attention [2], or that she might be focusing on her personal life and not prioritizing public responses to criticism [3].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks if Taylor Swift has publicly responded to Charlie Kirk's comments, but it does not provide context about the nature of those comments or the potential reasons why Swift might not have responded [1]. Sources like [3] and [3] suggest that Charlie Kirk's comments were widely criticized as sexist and demeaning, which could influence public perception of the situation [3]. Bias could be present in the original statement if it is framed in a way that assumes Taylor Swift should have responded publicly to Charlie Kirk's comments, without considering the potential consequences of engaging with criticism [5]. The sources, including [4] and [4], benefit from the attention and outrage generated by Charlie Kirk's comments, as they are able to report on the controversy and spark further discussion [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What were Charlie Kirk's exact comments about Taylor Swift?
Has Taylor Swift ever addressed conservative criticism of her music?
What is Charlie Kirk's history of criticizing celebrities like Taylor Swift?
How have Taylor Swift's fans reacted to Charlie Kirk's comments?
Has Taylor Swift used her platform to respond to other conservative commentators?