What reignited war between trump and musk today?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk reignited over the weekend when Musk renewed his criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, commonly referred to as the "One Big Beautiful Bill" [1] [2]. Specifically, Musk criticized this legislation on Saturday, stating it will "destroy millions of jobs in America" and cause "immense strategic harm" [2].
The conflict escalated when Trump responded by threatening to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government [3]. Trump stated that Musk's companies receive significant subsidies and that without them, Musk would have to close up shop [4]. In a particularly pointed remark, Trump said DOGE "might have to go back and eat" Elon Musk after his criticism of the GOP bill [4].
Musk responded by suggesting the formation of a new political party and continued his criticism of the president's bill, arguing it would lead to unsustainable debt [4]. The dispute has had immediate market consequences, with Tesla stock price sinking as the feud intensified [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal several important contextual factors missing from the original question:
- Financial stakes: The bill would eliminate subsidies for electric vehicle purchases that have benefited Tesla [3], creating a direct financial conflict of interest for Musk's primary business.
- Historical pattern: This is not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of disagreements. The rift between them began when Trump pursued tariffs that could raise costs for Musk's businesses, and Musk had previously criticized Trump's trade policies [5].
- Legislative context: The Senate has expressed desire to end the $7,500 EV tax credit [6], which would significantly impact Tesla's competitive position in the electric vehicle market.
- Timing pressure: Trump is urging Congress to pass the bill by July 4 [1], creating urgency around the dispute.
- Tesla's business struggles: Musk is dealing with struggles with his car company, Tesla [6], making the potential loss of government support particularly concerning.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains no apparent misinformation but lacks important context about the financial motivations driving both parties. The framing as a simple "war" between two personalities obscures the substantial economic interests at stake:
- Musk benefits financially from maintaining EV subsidies and government contracts for his companies (Tesla, SpaceX)
- Trump benefits politically from positioning himself as fiscally responsible while potentially weakening a prominent critic
The question also fails to acknowledge that this represents an escalation of existing tensions rather than a completely new conflict [5]. The dispute fundamentally centers on competing economic interests - Musk's desire to protect subsidies that benefit his businesses versus Trump's legislative agenda that would eliminate them.