Fact check: Did Vance Boelter and Melissia Hortman attend the same social events?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not support the claim that Vance Boelter and Melissa Hortman attended the same social events ^{[1] [2] [3]}. In fact, none of the sources mention any social interaction or attendance at the same events by the two individuals ^{[4] [5] [3]}. The sources primarily discuss the indictment, charges, and legal proceedings against Vance Boelter for the stalking and murders of Melissa Hortman and her husband, as well as other crimes ^[4]. The focus is on the violent incident and its aftermath, with no mention of prior social connections between Boelter and Hortman ^{[3] [6]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the lack of information about the relationship or interactions between Vance Boelter and Melissa Hortman prior to the incident ^[1]. The sources provided do not offer any alternative viewpoints on the topic of social events attendance, as they uniformly do not mention such interactions ^{[5] [3]}. Additionally, the sources do not provide any context about the social circles or events that Boelter and Hortman may have been a part of, which could potentially shed light on their relationship ^[3]. It is also worth noting that the sources primarily focus on the criminal aspects of the case, with little to no discussion of the social or personal lives of the individuals involved ^{[4] [6]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be considered misleading or inaccurate due to the lack of evidence supporting the claim that Vance Boelter and Melissa Hortman attended the same social events ^{[1] [2]}. The sources provided do not suggest any prior social connection or interaction between the two individuals, which could lead to the conclusion that the original statement is based on incomplete or inaccurate information ^[4]. It is possible that the original statement was made without proper verification or fact-checking, which could be considered a form of potential misinformation or bias ^[3]. The individuals who may benefit from this framing are those who seek to sensationalize or distort the facts of the case, potentially for their own purposes or agendas ^{[3] [6]}.