What exactly did rob reiner say that prompted backlash and when did it happen?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
On Dec. 15, 2025, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that Rob Reiner and his wife “passed away … reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME,” calling Reiner “tortured and struggling” — comments that drew swift bipartisan backlash [1] [2] [3]. The remarks came the day after Reiner and his wife were found dead in their Brentwood home and their son was arrested on suspicion of murder, facts reported alongside media coverage of the president’s post [4] [5].
1. What Trump wrote and when he posted it
President Trump posted the message on his Truth Social account on Monday, Dec. 15, 2025, less than 24 hours after the bodies of Rob Reiner, 78, and his wife Michele Singer Reiner, 68, were discovered in their Brentwood, Los Angeles home on Sunday [1] [2]. In that post Trump described Reiner as “a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star” and explicitly blamed “the anger he caused others” and an “incurable affliction … known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME” for their deaths [1] [6].
2. Why the wording sparked immediate backlash
News outlets and political figures of both parties called the post inappropriate for linking a violent double homicide to Reiner’s political views. Reuters summarized the core objection: Trump “suggested the slain actor and director died because of his anti‑Trump views,” a claim made without evidence and condemned as politicizing a family tragedy [3]. The Washington Post and others noted that the president was effectively positing a connection between Reiner’s criticism of him and the killings, even though authorities had released little information about motive [5] [4].
3. Who pushed back — and from which political corners
Backlash came from across the spectrum. Republican lawmakers publicly rebuked the statement as disrespectful to a murdered man; one GOP representative said “this is inappropriate and disrespectful discourse about a man who was just brutally murdered” [3]. Prominent media and conservative voices also criticized the timing and tone; several outlets reported that even some of Trump’s supporters on Truth Social condemned the post as callous [7] [8]. Democrats and Hollywood figures likewise denounced the remarks as making a family tragedy about politics [2] [9].
4. The factual context reporters highlighted in coverage
Coverage repeatedly noted two contemporaneous facts: investigators were treating the deaths as homicides, and the couple’s son, Nick Reiner, 32, had been arrested and was being held on a $4 million bond, but authorities had not publicly tied motive to politics [4] [5]. Reuters and other outlets emphasized that Trump offered no evidence that Reiner’s political remarks had any causal role in the killings [3] [5].
5. Competing narratives and why they matter
One narrative — advanced by Trump’s post — framed Reiner’s long‑standing criticism of the president as part of what drove the fatal outcome; that framing assigns moral or causal responsibility to Reiner’s public opposition [1]. The competing, and dominant, narrative in mainstream reporting stresses that assigning political motive is speculative and harmful when a family is grieving and an investigation is ongoing; journalists and politicians criticized the president for drawing that leap [5] [3]. Both narratives carry political implications: one casts critics as dangerous, the other warns leaders not to weaponize tragedies for partisan gain [7].
6. Limitations in available reporting and unanswered questions
Available sources do not mention any evidence presented by authorities that Reiner’s political activity contributed to the killings; reporting instead documents an arrest of the son and the ongoing homicide investigation without a publicly stated motive [4] [5]. Sources also do not include the full, verbatim Truth Social post beyond multiple quoted passages, nor do they report any subsequent clarification or retraction by the president in the provided material [1] [6].
7. Why this episode is politically and culturally consequential
News organizations framed the incident as a test of norms after other high‑profile political violence debates this year. CNN and others noted that the episode undercuts claims by some conservatives that their side would respond with civility to political murder, because the president’s post appeared to politicize the Reiners’ deaths shortly after they were reported [7]. The broad bipartisan and intra‑movement criticism underscores how quickly public figures can be isolated for rhetoric perceived as exploiting tragedy [8].
Sources cited in this piece: reporting from Variety [1], The Guardian [2], Reuters [3], The Washington Post [5], CNBC [4], CNN [7], Newsweek [10], Raw Story [8], Cleveland.com [6], The Independent [11], Parade [12], and SavannahNow [9].