Who is Julie Green and what are her most famous prophecies?
Executive summary
Julie Green is a self-described Christian prophet who leads Julie Green Ministries International and speaks at conservative, MAGA-aligned events; she began preaching publicly in the 2010s and serves as an active online broadcaster of prophetic messages [1] [2] [3]. Her most widely reported prophecies blend vague political and cultural warnings with specific, high-profile claims—some of which critics say have failed to come to pass—fueling both a devoted following and sharp media backlash [3] [4] [5].
1. Who is Julie Green? — An evangelical minister turned “prophet” with a media platform
Julie Green presents herself as an associate pastor and prophetic minister who started preaching around 2010 and became an associate at Faith Family Fellowship in the 2010s, later founding Julie Green Ministries International to publish daily prophetic messages online [1] [2] [6]. She has become a regular speaker at conservative Christian events such as the ReAwaken America Tour and has cultivated ties to MAGA-aligned political figures, a linkage repeatedly noted in coverage that frames her as part of a Christian-nationalist ecosystem [7] [3].
2. What are her most famous prophecies? — From “Babylon has fallen” to coups and celebrity murder claims
Green’s public prophecies combine sweeping spiritual pronouncements—“Babylon has fallen” and calls for the establishment to be “decimated”—with pointed political forecasts, including promises that legal actions against Donald Trump would collapse and that President Joe Biden would be removed, as well as an overarching prediction of an “overthrow” or “reinstatement” moving power from the “wicked” to the “righteous” [6] [4] [8]. She has also made more sensational specific claims that drew widespread coverage: a reported prophecy that Prince Charles would have his mother murdered, and assertions that the “real Joe Biden is dead” and replaced by a double—examples that media outlets highlighted as especially outlandish [3]. Other widely noted forecasts include a prediction that Trump would be found “innocent” in his criminal trials and earlier warnings that figures such as Nancy Pelosi would die before the 2022 midterms—predictions later characterized in reporting as having not materialized [5] [4].
3. How the press and critics frame her prophecies — False prophet, political actor, or prophet-in-tradition?
Mainstream outlets and critics frequently describe Green as a “self-styled” or “MAGA” prophet whose political allegiances shape her messages, cataloguing a pattern of precise, high-stakes claims that have failed to come true and portraying her as part of a movement that amplifies political grievance through religious language [4] [3] [7]. Religious commentators offer alternative readings: some argue that modern prophetic practice is not strictly about predictive accuracy but about offering a corrective or imaginative vision that challenges power structures—an interpretive frame used by thinkers like Diana Butler Bass to contextualize figures such as Green within prophetic tradition [9].
4. Her supporters and her organization’s response — Audience, warnings about impersonation, and insistence on sincerity
Supporters and event organizers continue to feature Green at major conservative religious gatherings, and her ministry emphasizes that it does not solicit money in exchange for promises while warning followers about impersonators on social media, reflecting an attempt to institutionalize her brand and manage influence online [2]. Advocacy critics and watchdogs, however, catalogue Green among “false prophets,” citing her political prognostications and ties to election-related claims as evidence that her prophecy functions as political advocacy rather than neutral spiritual insight [7].
5. Assessment — A mixed legacy of vivid rhetoric, contested accuracy, and partisan consequence
The public record assembled by news outlets and her own publications shows a body of prophecy that mixes broad apocalyptic language with occasional explicit forecasts about elections, legal outcomes, and public figures; those explicit forecasts are the ones most vulnerable to falsification and have drawn the harshest media scrutiny when they did not occur [6] [5] [3]. At the same time, some religious analysts defend prophetic speech as socially and spiritually generative even when predictions fail, making the debate about Green as much theological and political as it is empirical [9]. Reporting reviewed here documents both her influence within a specific political-religious network and the repeated controversies around particular high-profile prophecies; sources do not resolve whether her predictions are divinely inspired, only that they are consequential and contested [2] [4].