Who photographed or documented the Buga Sphere and are their images publicly available?
Executive summary
Multiple videos and photographs of the Buga Sphere were first shared online in March–April 2025 and have since been shown at press events and by researchers; Maussan Televisión displayed the object in Mexico City [1] [2]. News outlets and reportage identify at least two distinct eyewitness videos (one attributed to “María” and a second by a man in nearby mountains), and scientists and commentators have publicly examined imagery and X‑rays shared by investigators [1] [3] [4].
1. Who first filmed and publicly documented the object? — Two witness videos spark the story
Reporting says the incident first surfaced when a social‑media video from March 2025 showed a luminous metallic sphere over Buga, Colombia; a second video from a man in nearby mountains soon followed, and one early account attributes the first clip to a young woman named “María” [1]. Coverage in mainstream outlets and specialized blogs treats those two separate recordings as the initial visual record that propelled further collection and analysis [1] [4].
2. Which investigators and media have photographed or exhibited the sphere? — Scientists, Maussan Television and public showings
Investigators from Colombia and Mexico reportedly performed high‑resolution photography and radiographic imaging between May and July 2025; that reporting describes X‑rays and optical microscopy used to document the object’s external features and internal structure [3]. The sphere was displayed at a Maussan Television press conference in Mexico City and shown to an invited audience including researchers and critics, confirming that photographers at that event had direct access to the object [2].
3. Are the images and videos publicly available? — Mixed availability and scattered repositories
News outlets published video excerpts and stills from eyewitness recordings and laboratory imaging; People magazine and other sites reported photos and discussed X‑ray images [4]. Independent repositories and fan projects also host material: a dedicated “Buga Sphere Repository” claims to preserve analysis certifications and downloadable documents, and hobbyist 3‑D models and STL files based on published images appear on platforms such as Sketchfab, MakerWorld and Cults3D—indicating public circulation of visual material derived from the case [5] [6] [7] [8].
4. What kinds of imagery exist and who produced them? — Eyewitness video, high‑res photography, X‑rays, and renderings
Sources describe at least four types of visual documentation in circulation: (a) original eyewitness smartphone videos of the object in flight (attributed to two witnesses) [1]; (b) high‑resolution photography taken by investigators during physical inspection [3]; (c) radiographic/X‑ray images showing internal structure reported by analysts [3] [4]; and (d) public derivative works—3‑D models and STL downloads—made by hobbyists referencing published imagery [6] [7] [8].
5. How authoritative are the published images? — Questions remain about provenance and scientific vetting
Multiple outlets report investigators’ images and X‑rays, but independent peer‑reviewed confirmation of the sphere’s provenance or the chain‑of‑custody for specific photographs is not shown in the available reporting [3] [4]. Some scientists quoted in coverage express skepticism—calling the object “like a really cool art project”—underscoring disputes over interpretation even when imagery is published [4]. The presence of enthusiast repositories and commercial 3‑D models complicates the provenance trail; these derivative items reflect public interest, not independent verification [6] [5].
6. Contradictory narratives and motives — Media showings, promotional interests, and fringe amplification
The sphere’s public display at Maussan Television and attention from figures like Steven Greer indicate active promotion within UFO‑community channels [2] [9]. Simultaneously, mainstream coverage (People, Times of India) and skeptical commentators treat the imagery but urge caution, suggesting possible art projects or hoaxes [4] [10]. Some websites and blogs advance dramatic technical claims (negative mass, ancient dating) tied to the same images; those claims are present in reporting but are not uniformly corroborated by mainstream science sources cited here [11] [10].
7. What’s missing from current reporting — Chain of custody and full image releases
Available sources document videos, photographs, and X‑rays being shown and circulated, but explicit, complete public archives of original unedited footage or a single centralized, independently curated image repository are not demonstrated in the reporting provided [1] [3] [5]. Public sources do not mention full, peer‑reviewed publication of laboratory images with complete provenance and metadata; available sources do not mention that level of scientific release [3] [5].
8. How to evaluate images you find — Practical checklist for journalists and researchers
Treat eyewitness video and event photos as leads, not conclusive proof: check for original file metadata and source attribution; prefer images released by recognized labs or institutions with documentation; cross‑reference X‑ray and microscopy reports with independent lab certifications when available [3] [5]. The mix of press‑conference displays, hobbyist recreations, and sensational claims in the sources requires careful source‑level scrutiny [2] [6].
Conclusion: multiple videos and investigative images of the Buga Sphere have been published and shown publicly—witness video clips, investigator photographs and X‑rays circulate in news reports and in specialist repositories [1] [3] [5]. However, full, independently verified image archives and a universally accepted scientific account of the images’ provenance are not evident in the cited reporting [3] [4].