Why is the song jingle bells racist?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Kyna Hamill’s 2017 research documents that the song first known as “The One‑Horse Open Sleigh” debuted in a Boston venue that staged minstrel shows and was performed in blackface [1] [2]. Hamill’s paper does not assert that James Lord Pierpont composed the song explicitly to mock Black people or that the lyrics directly reference slavery; those stronger claims are advanced by viral videos and commentators and are disputed by the researcher and other coverage [1] [3] [4].
1. Origins in performance history: what the scholarship actually found
Boston University theater professor Kyna Hamill traced the earliest documented public performance of the tune to Ordway Hall in Boston on September 15, 1857, a venue that hosted minstrel entertainments, and identified that a blackface performer sang the piece then called “The One‑Horse Open Sleigh” [1] [2]. This performance history is the basis for renewed scrutiny: the song’s earliest public life intersected with a theatrical form premised on racist caricature [2] [1].
2. Where reporting and viral claims go further than the research
A number of viral videos and commentators assert that Pierpont wrote “Jingle Bells” to mock Black people, that lines like “laughing all the way” reference racist routines such as the “Laughing Darkie,” or that sleigh‑bells echo bells placed on enslaved people — claims that Hamill’s article and surviving lyrics do not establish [5] [6] [7]. Hamill herself has repeatedly said her work is being misrepresented and that she did not claim the composer’s intent was racist or that the modern song should be labeled racist in use today [3] [1] [4].
3. The composer’s biography and the contested Confederate label
Reporting highlights that James Lord Pierpont later lived in the South and enlisted in a Georgia Confederate unit, and that some of his other songs used racist language; critics emphasize those facts to argue for a racist context [6] [8]. Other commentators stress that Pierpont came from a Northern abolitionist family and likely wrote the sleigh‑ride song from New England experience, arguing that the tune itself celebrates winter recreation rather than serving as a racial attack [9] [1].
4. How the song’s early performance context fuels modern concern
Minstrelsy was a mainstream 19th‑century entertainment form that normalized caricature of Black people; the fact that “Jingle Bells” entered public life through that ecosystem explains why some modern viewers read racist origins into the tune [2] [1]. Some institutions and educators have reacted — for example, schools removing the song from curricula — citing the song’s “questionable past,” though those decisions draw on interpretations beyond what Hamill’s paper claims [4].
5. Points of disagreement among sources
Coverage diverges on three linked questions: whether Pierpont intended racial mockery when composing the song; whether the lyrics or title have coded references to slave restraints; and whether modern performances carry racist meaning. Hamill’s research supports the performance‑history link to minstrelsy but does not prove intent or lyrical racism; viral social posts and some commentators present stronger claims that Hamill disavows and that other reporters say are unsupported by the surviving text [1] [3] [4].
6. Why this matters now: cultural memory and “whitewashing”
Advocates of the viral interpretation argue that the song’s cheerful ubiquity masks an unsettling origin story and accuse local markers and histories of whitewashing that origin [7] [3]. Critics counter that exaggerating the evidence risks turning a historical footnote into an attack on longstanding traditions and that context, not erasure, is the right corrective [9] [4].
7. Bottom line for listeners and institutions
The peer‑reviewed research establishes a documented link between the song’s earliest public performance and 19th‑century minstrel entertainment, which justifiably invites scrutiny [1] [2]. The stronger claims — that Pierpont wrote it explicitly to mock Black people, that lyrics reference slave collars, or that every modern performance is inherently racist — are not supported by Hamill’s paper and are disputed in current reporting [4] [3]. Available sources do not mention definitive proof that the surviving lyrics carry racial dialect or direct references to enslaved people [4].
Limitations: this analysis relies on the cited reporting and Hamill’s published article as represented in these sources; I do not assert facts beyond what those sources state [1] [4].