How does per capita residential water use in California compare to the US average?

Checked on January 28, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

California’s statewide per‑capita residential water use commonly reported in the 80–85 gallons per person per day (gpcd) range, which is roughly on par with or slightly above a cited U.S. household average of about 82 gallons per day (gpd) [1] [2] [3]. That headline similarity masks enormous regional, seasonal and indoor/outdoor differences across the state, and evolving policy aims that target much lower indoor use levels [1] [4] [5].

1. Measured averages: California’s headline numbers and the U.S. benchmark

Statewide reporting and analyses commonly put California’s residential per‑capita use near 83–85 gpcd in recent snapshots — the Legislative Analyst/State Water Board summary reports an 85 gpcd average for 2016 while other media summaries cite 83 gpcd for specific months in later years [1] [4]. By contrast, a WaterSense/EPA figure cited by a local water agency pegs the U.S. household average at about 82 gpd, making California roughly “middle of the road” nationally when using those comparable figures [3] [2].

2. The statewide average conceals sharp regional contrasts

Those statewide averages flatten dramatic intra‑state variation: San Francisco Bay residents averaged as little as 64 gpcd in 2016 while residents in the Colorado River hydrologic region averaged 147 gpcd the same year, and recent county snapshots showed San Francisco at 40 gpd versus Riverside County at 137 gpd in a single month, underscoring how climate, landscape and local practices drive per‑person use [1] [4]. Pacific Institute and state utility maps demonstrate that some service areas report far higher systemwide residential gpcd and that conservation response has been uneven across utilities [6] [7].

3. Indoor versus outdoor water use and policy ambitions matter

National and state comparisons can swing depending on whether figures count total residential use or just indoor consumption: California agencies have identified a statewide median indoor residential use of about 48 gallons per capita per day and are recommending progressive indoor standards that would decline to 42 gpcd by 2030, signaling that policy targets for indoor use are already considerably below headline per‑capita totals [5]. That distinction matters because outdoor irrigation, which varies with yard size and climate, often accounts for most of the gap between indoor targets and total residential gpcd [4] [8].

4. Trends: long‑term declines but seasonality and drought rebounds complicate the picture

Multiple analyses find per‑capita residential use has trended downward over decades even before recent droughts, yet seasonal peaks in summer and year‑to‑year rebounds complicate short‑term comparisons — for example, statewide monthly averages rose from winter lows (64 gpcd) to summer highs (109 gpcd) in 2016, and some regions saw double‑digit summer increases versus the prior year [1] [8]. Pacific Institute and state data portals show both progress and persistent high‑use outliers, meaning a single statewide gpcd number captures only part of the story [6] [7].

5. Data limitations, interpretive caveats and who benefits from particular framings

Comparing California to a single U.S. “average” requires care: national figures may use different definitions (indoor vs total residential), different years, and different measurement methods than California’s monthly utility‑reported gpcd datasets, so apples‑to‑apples alignment is not guaranteed [9] [7]. Moreover, agencies advocating for stricter indoor standards (DWR, State Water Board) emphasize lower indoor medians to justify regulations, while local utilities may highlight higher systemwide numbers to argue for flexible local approaches — both agendas shape which metrics get emphasized in public debate [5] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
How do California’s indoor residential water use standards compare to other U.S. states?
Which California regions show the highest outdoor residential water use and what drives those differences?
How do measurement methods (indoor vs total, meter vs modeled) affect per‑capita water use comparisons between states?