Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Will humanity keep climate change to below 2 degrees C

Checked on November 18, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The latest major assessments show the world is unlikely to keep warming below 1.5°C and is currently headed toward somewhere between about 2.3°C and 2.8°C this century under stated pledges and current policies (UNEP/Emissions Gap Report, New York Times) [1][2]. Some analysts offer a narrower optimistic path that could bring median warming close to ~1.9°C if an expanded set of net‑zero targets are fully achieved, but that scenario depends on optimistic assumptions about implementation (Climate Action Tracker) [3].

1. The short answer: the odds are against staying below 2°C under current pledges

The UN’s Emissions Gap Report 2025 finds that full implementation of countries’ submitted Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) would still leave global warming in the neighborhood of 2.3–2.5°C this century, while current policies point to about 2.8°C — well above the Paris “well below 2°C” goal [1][4]. Major news outlets summarizing that report say the world is “on track” for roughly 2.3–2.8°C based on recent pledges and policies [2][5].

2. There is an optimistic “what‑if” pathway — but it’s conditional and narrow

Climate Action Tracker’s “optimistic” pathway, which assumes governments achieve a wide range of net‑zero targets (including many still under discussion), yields a median warming estimate of about 1.9°C (probabilistically likely below 2.1°C) [3]. That outcome would require countries to meet targets they have only announced or pledged — and to follow through rapidly with deep emissions cuts — a high bar given gaps between pledges and delivery highlighted by UNEP [3][1].

3. The 1.5°C benchmark is effectively lost in the near term, and overshoot is expected

UN modeling — echoed by the World Meteorological Organization and reporting across outlets — shows a very high probability that annual or multi‑year averages will exceed 1.5°C in the coming decade, and that a temporary overshoot of 1.5°C is “very likely” if current trends continue [6][7]. UNEP warns a near‑term overshoot is almost unavoidable unless governments quickly and ambitiously accelerate action [1].

4. Why models diverge: scenarios, assumptions and implementation gaps

Projections differ because groups use different assumptions about which pledges are realized, how quickly emissions fall, and the role of technologies like carbon dioxide removal. UNEP’s headline projections reflect current policies and recently updated NDCs and still show a large implementation gap [1][4]. In contrast, Climate Action Tracker’s lower estimate rests on an “optimistic” assumption that a wide set of net‑zero pledges are fully achieved — an outcome the UNEP report treats as far from guaranteed [3][1].

5. Stakes and tipping points: why 2°C matters politically and physically

Reporting by CNN and Al Jazeera stresses the real-world stakes: warming above 2°C raises the risk of major ecosystem shifts and potential tipping points — for example, severe and lasting changes to ice sheets and the Amazon — which would have profound and possibly irreversible impacts [8][9]. UNEP and other scientists emphasize that every fraction of a degree matters for lives, ecosystems and economic losses [1][4].

6. Political realities: promises, rollbacks and geopolitical friction

Coverage notes political dynamics that shape prospects: some countries have strengthened pledges and clean‑energy deployment has reduced forecasted emissions in certain regions, but other policies — including major rollbacks or lack of high‑level engagement by some governments — could add to projected warming [2][10]. UNEP explicitly highlights the need for unprecedented rapid cuts and for navigating a “challenging geopolitical environment” to change the trajectory [1].

7. What would be required to make staying below 2°C plausible?

UNEP calculates emissions reductions of about 35% (relative to 2019) by 2035 are needed to align with the Paris 2°C pathway; achieving 1.5°C demands even steeper cuts (about 55% by 2035) and rapid scaling of finance, technology and carbon removal — actions the report says are possible but extremely demanding [1][4]. Climate Action Tracker’s more hopeful number is contingent on rapid, full implementation of many net‑zero commitments [3].

8. Bottom line — realistic expectation and debate

Available reporting converges on this: absent a dramatic and immediate escalation in policy ambition, implementation and international cooperation, the world is likely to exceed 1.5°C and is currently projected toward roughly 2.3–2.8°C under pledges and policies [1][2]. There is a contested but narrower pathway to remain below ~2°C if a broad set of net‑zero targets are fully realized, yet that path depends on political will and execution that current UN analysis treats as unlikely without major changes [3][1].

Limitations: this analysis relies on the cited 2025 assessments and news summaries; available sources do not mention longer‑term technological breakthroughs, specific country‑by‑country delivery rates beyond the UNEP and CAT aggregates, nor do they claim certainty about probabilistic outcomes beyond their modelled scenarios [1][3].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the latest IPCC projections for global warming pathways to stay below 2°C?
Which countries' emission pledges still make a 2°C target feasible by 2100?
What large-scale technologies (e.g., DAC, BECCS) would be needed to ensure warming stays under 2°C?
How do short-lived climate pollutants like methane affect the likelihood of meeting the 2°C goal?
What economic and policy measures are most effective for rapid decarbonization this decade?