Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What would happen if Canada cut off electricity to the USA
Executive Summary
A sudden Canadian cutoff of electricity to the United States would cause localized reliability stress but not a nationwide blackout, because U.S. power systems are large, decentralized, and equipped with backup generation and interconnections beyond Canada. Cross-border flows currently provide valuable firm, low‑carbon capacity and flexibility for certain U.S. regions, so a prolonged loss would raise costs, increase emissions, and strain grids in border states and hydropower-dependent regions [1] [2] [3].
1. Why North American grids are intertwined — and why a cutoff would bite where it matters
The North American electricity system features significant integration between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico for reliability and decarbonization goals, with bilateral transmission links and hydropower deliveries smoothing variability from wind and solar in the U.S. This integration means some U.S. balancing areas rely on Canadian hydro to provide firm, dispatchable power during shortages; losing those imports would tighten reserve margins and force higher-cost or higher-emitting resources online, particularly in the Northeast and Great Lakes regions [1] [2]. The academic modeling of cross-border infrastructure shows flows increase with added capacity and lower fuel-transport costs, underscoring how integrated markets are optimized across borders [4].
2. How much power actually crosses the border — and who would feel it first
Cross-border electricity trade is material but concentrated: Canada exports hydropower and other generation mainly into adjacent U.S. markets rather than supplying the entire country. Regions tied closely to Canadian imports—New England, New York, Michigan, and parts of the U.S. Pacific Northwest—would experience the largest short-term impacts, confronting higher prices and reliability stress during peak demand or extreme weather. Studies concluding that increased transmission raises flows also implicitly show the current system's dependence on specific corridors; removing them would not collapse the entire U.S. grid but would shift burdens onto domestic gas, coal, or dispatchable demand-response resources [4] [5].
3. Economic hits: losses, price spikes, and resilience costs
Long-duration interruptions translate into broad economic losses from halted industrial production, household disruptions, and supply‑chain ripple effects; methods estimating economy-wide costs of major outages show substantial GDP impacts when outages are widespread and prolonged. A Canadian cutoff would likely produce localized price spikes and real economic pain in affected regions, with businesses paying more for electricity or backup generation and households facing service interruptions if utilities cannot immediately replace imports [3]. The modeling literature emphasizes that backup generation, demand response, and imports from elsewhere mitigate impacts but at a cost, meaning consumers and governments absorb higher expenditures.
4. Legal, political, and trade consequences — escalation risks
Cutting electricity across an international border would not be a purely technical act; it would trigger trade and diplomatic mechanisms. U.S.-Canada trade relations and energy cooperation frameworks are designed to manage disputes and interdependence, and the USMCA-era institutional links reflect both cooperation and tensions in energy policy. A deliberate cutoff would almost certainly provoke legal, diplomatic, and potentially retaliatory commercial responses, complicating resolution and raising the stakes beyond immediate grid effects [6] [7]. The Congressional Research Service and related policy analyses highlight that energy ties are embedded in broader bilateral relations.
5. What system operators and planners say — resilience is layered, not single-point
System operators plan for contingencies with layered resilience: reserves, demand response, internal generation, and interconnections with multiple neighbors. While Canadian imports provide a valuable buffer and low-carbon firming for U.S. renewables, operators model scenarios with lost imports and seek to maintain reliability by dispatching alternatives. Research suggests that increasing cross-border transmission capacity improves overall efficiency, but dependence on a single external supplier remains a vulnerability planners try to address through diversified portfolios and infrastructure investments [4] [5].
6. Bottom line: serious regional impacts, manageable nationally if responses mobilize
A Canadian cutoff would create real, measurable regional reliability risks, higher prices, and economic losses, particularly where hydropower imports are significant. It would not cause a uniform U.S. collapse because of the grid’s size and redundancy, but the episode would expose vulnerabilities in border regions and provoke political and legal fallout. Policymakers and grid operators would mitigate damage via domestic dispatchable generation, demand‑response, and emergency coordination; however, mitigation would be costly and raise emissions compared with the low‑carbon imports that would be lost [1] [3] [7].