Is China's carbon emissions as larger as the combined emissions of the next 9 largest emitters?

Checked on December 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

China remains by far the world’s largest annual greenhouse‑gas emitter, accounting for roughly one‑third of global emissions and emitting an estimated 15.1–15.2 GtCO2e in 2025 according to Climate Action Tracker (CAT) [1]. Available sources do not provide a single, authoritative figure that directly compares China’s emissions to the precise combined total of the “next nine” largest emitters; reporting instead focuses on China’s share (~30%) and recent trends of flat or slightly falling emissions [2] [3].

1. China’s scale: a country that equals a region

Multiple analysts describe China as the largest single emitter and attribute around 30% of global CO2 or greenhouse‑gas emissions to it; CAT quantifies China’s 2025 emissions at about 15.1–15.2 GtCO2e [1] and outlets such as Scientific American and Euronews state China accounts for roughly one‑third of global emissions [2] [4]. These magnitudes mean China’s annual output is comparable to the emissions of entire world regions or a large group of mid‑sized emitters.

2. The “China vs. next nine” claim: not corroborated in these sources

The specific assertion that “China’s emissions are as large as the combined emissions of the next nine largest emitters” is not asserted or confirmed by the provided reporting. Sources here give China’s share and global totals (for example, Global Carbon Project’s 38.1 GtCO2 global fossil fuel figure cited by the New York Times), but they do not list the ranked emissions of the next nine countries and their sum to test that exact claim [3] [1]. Therefore: available sources do not mention a direct China = next‑9 combined comparison [1] [3].

3. What the available numbers imply — a quick arithmetic check

Using figures in the reporting gives context: the Global Carbon Project's 2025 global fossil CO2 projection is ~38.1 GtCO2 [3]. If China’s territorial emissions are ~15.1–15.2 GtCO2e in 2025 (CAT) that is roughly 40%–41% of that fossil‑CO2 total or about 30% of broader greenhouse‑gas tallies cited elsewhere [1] [3]. Summing the next several large emitters — the United States, India, the EU, Russia, Japan, etc. — would plausibly exceed or approximate China’s number depending on data year and whether you use CO2 only, CO2e, or territorial vs consumption metrics. But the precise equality to “next nine” cannot be confirmed in these sources [1] [3].

4. Why the ambiguity exists: data types and timing matter

Reports use different metrics: territorial CO2, CO2e (all greenhouse gases), or consumption‑based emissions; they also use different years and provisional 2025 projections. CAT’s 15.1–15.2 GtCO2e is a 2025 GHG estimate excluding some LULUCF items [1]. The Global Carbon Project number cited by the New York Times refers to fossil CO2 only and is a global total [3]. These definitional differences produce materially different rankings and sums, which is why no single source here states the “China equals next nine” formulation outright [1] [3].

5. Recent trends matter to the headline claim

Several analyses show China’s emissions flattened or fell slightly through 2024–2025 because renewables growth offset demand, with Carbon Brief/CREA and others reporting falls of ~1% over 12 months or 1.6% in Q1 2025 [5] [6]. Scientific American and New Scientist describe a plateau in 2025 that could mark a peak [2] [7]. Those downward tweaks change the gap between China and other emitters but do not by themselves validate or refute the “next‑nine” claim in the sources provided [5] [7].

6. Competing perspectives and institutional agendas

Climate Action Tracker and Carbon Brief emphasize technical measurement and policy evaluation; CAT labeled China’s policies “highly insufficient” even while estimating a 2025 level of 15.1–15.2 GtCO2e [1]. Media outlets highlighting a China peak (Scientific American, New Scientist) stress the symbolic shift and renewable rollout, while government statements (Xinhua) emphasize slowing growth and progress narratives [2] [7] [8]. These differences reflect different institutional priorities: watchdog analysis versus national messaging [1] [8].

7. Bottom line for the reader

China is by far the largest single emitter (around 15.1–15.2 GtCO2e in 2025 per CAT and roughly 30% of global emissions in other reporting), but the exact claim that China’s emissions equal the combined emissions of the next nine largest emitters is not supported or quantified in the provided sources; available sources do not mention that precise comparison [1] [3]. To settle that rhetorical yardstick you need a ranked, same‑metric dataset for all countries for the same year — data not included in the documents supplied here [1] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How do China's current CO2 emissions compare numerically to the next nine largest emitters combined?
What countries make up the next nine largest emitters and what are their individual emission totals?
How have China's and the other top emitters' shares of global emissions changed since 1990?
What role do per-capita emissions and historical cumulative emissions play in comparing China to other emitters?
How do recent policy measures, economic slowdowns, and energy shifts affect China's emissions trajectory through 2025?