What percentage of climate scientists agree on human-caused climate change?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided suggest that there is a strong consensus among climate scientists that human-caused climate change is real and ongoing, with estimates ranging from 97% to over 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers in agreement ^[1]. According to the sources, this consensus is supported by multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and statements from reputable scientific organizations, including NASA ^{[2] [3] [4]}. The sources also report that the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change ^[3]. A survey of 88,125 climate-related studies found that more than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans ^[1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

While the analyses provide strong evidence for the consensus on human-caused climate change, some sources do not provide direct information about the percentage of climate scientists who agree on this issue ^[2]. Additionally, the sources do not present alternative viewpoints or dissenting opinions on the topic, which could provide a more nuanced understanding of the debate ^{[1] [5]}. It is also important to note that the sources primarily rely on peer-reviewed scientific papers and statements from reputable scientific organizations, which may not represent the full range of perspectives on the issue ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Furthermore, the sources do not discuss the potential implications of human-caused climate change or the actions that can be taken to mitigate its effects, which could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic ^{[5] [1]}.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks for the percentage of climate scientists who agree on human-caused climate change, but it does not provide any context or information about the sources or methods used to determine this percentage ^{[1] [5]}. This lack of context could lead to misinformation or bias, as different sources may have different estimates or methodologies for determining the level of consensus among climate scientists ^{[1] [2]}. Additionally, the statement does not acknowledge the potential for alternative viewpoints or dissenting opinions on the topic, which could create a biased or one-sided perception of the debate ^{[2] [3] [4]}. The sources cited, including NASA and peer-reviewed scientific journals, are generally considered reputable and trustworthy, but it is still important to consider the potential for bias or misinformation in the presentation of the information ^{[1] [5]}.