Which countries are most at risk of 'Day Zero' water crises and what adaptation plans do they have?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A growing body of science and reporting identifies hotspots where “Day Zero” — the point when local water demand exceeds supply and taps run perilously low — is already a realistic near-term risk, notably parts of Iran, South Africa (urban centres like Cape Town), large Indian cities and drought-prone southern Europe, with Mexico City also commonly flagged as vulnerable [1] [2] [3] [4]. Responses vary from emergency rationing and local conservation campaigns to long-term investments in infrastructure, governance reform, glacier and basin management, and technological competitions — but experts warn current measures are uneven and often insufficient without faster emissions cuts and systemic water governance change [5] [6] [7] [8].
1. Which countries and cities sit highest on the Day Zero map
Scientific mapping of Day Zero Drought (DZD) emergence highlights global hotspots where hydrological extremes and demand converge: the analysis points to early emergence in parts of Africa (exemplified by Cape Town’s 2017–18 near-miss), the Middle East (Tehran and broader Iran), large South Asian urban centres, Mediterranean and Iberian regions of Europe, and many rapidly growing megacities including Mexico City — all identified in peer‑reviewed and journalistic reporting as at elevated risk of supply collapse [8] [2] [1] [4] [3].
2. Why these places are vulnerable — climate, consumption and broken hydrology
The drivers are a compound mix: anthropogenic warming shifts the hydrological cycle and can make droughts longer and recovery periods shorter, shrinking reservoir and groundwater buffers; booming urban populations and rising per‑capita demand add pressure; and historical over‑extraction and ageing infrastructure mean many systems lack the resilience to ride out prolonged deficits [8] [2] [9] [3].
3. What adaptation plans governments and cities are using today
Responses reported range from immediate rationing and contingency planning (Tehran has planned rationing as supplies dwindle) to behavioural limits and emergency conservation (Cape Town’s 2018 campaign cut city water use dramatically), alongside infrastructure measures such as pipeline rehabilitation, pressure management, reuse, and reservoir optimisation in programs described as “Water for All” or municipal upgrade efforts [1] [10] [7] [4]. The UN World Water Development Report 2025 emphasises glacier and mountain‑source management as a strategic adaptation priority for regions dependent on meltwater [6].
4. Innovation, finance and governance: patchy scale-up and competing agendas
Innovation and finance are being mobilised — from high‑profile prize funds like XPRIZE Water Scarcity to NGO solar desalination projects — but these initiatives sit beside political constraints and entrenched governance failures; analysts warn that without deep governance reform (allocation rules, aquifer protection) and climate mitigation, technical fixes only delay harder trade‑offs [7] [11] [5]. International institutions are urging integrated water‑climate planning, yet national capacities and priorities vary, and adaptation funding remains uneven [12] [13].
5. Where adaptation is working and where critical gaps remain
Cape Town’s crisis response is often cited as a model: rapid public communication, strict demand management and governance adjustments averted an immediate Day Zero [10] [9]. By contrast, Iran’s acute stresses show how depleted aquifers and low dam levels create a structural problem that rationing alone cannot fix without long‑term reforms [5] [1]. Scientific work warns that recovery intervals are shortening globally, meaning ad hoc emergency measures will be insufficient as DZD events become more frequent [8].
6. Bottom line — who is most at risk and what would change the trajectory
Countries and cities with a convergence of climate exposure, high urban demand, depleted groundwater and weak governance — notably parts of Iran, drought‑prone African and South Asian cities, southern Europe and several Latin American megacities — are most at risk of Day Zero in coming decades [8] [2] [1] [4]. Shifting that trajectory requires a three‑pronged approach already advocated by the UN and researchers: dramatically scale up basin and mountain‑source protection, accelerate urban infrastructure and reuse investments, and couple those with emissions reductions so that the hydrological stressors do not intensify further [6] [13] [8]. Reporting and studies make clear that without faster systemic action, the world will see more frequent, harder-to-recover Day Zero events — and adaptation plans today are unevenly prepared for that future [8] [12].