Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: EU ima ogroman ekološki otisak po glavi stanovnika (a i apsolutno).

Checked on January 21, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement about the EU's large ecological footprint is well-supported by multiple data points:

  • The EU's per capita CO2 emissions are 1.5 times higher than the global average, reaching 11 tons annually when including imported goods and services [1]
  • Luxembourg leads with 14.5 metric tons of CO2 equivalent per capita, double the EU average of 7.25 tCO₂e/cap [2]
  • Germany is the largest absolute polluter, responsible for about 25% of EU-27's total emissions with 780 MtCO₂e in 2022 [2]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual factors are missing from the original statement:

  • While the EU's footprint remains high, emissions have decreased by approximately 35% since 1990 [2]
  • The EU's per capita emissions (11 tons) are lower than the US (21 tons) but higher than China (8 tons) [1]
  • There is significant internal inequality in emissions:
  • The top 10% of EU emitters produce around 24 tons of CO2 per capita [3]
  • Within-country emissions inequality is becoming more significant than between-country differences [3]
  • Attempts at "green growth" have been unsuccessful, as there is no empirical evidence of meaningful decoupling of economic growth from environmental impact [4]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

While the original statement is factually correct, it lacks important nuance:

  • It doesn't acknowledge the ongoing efforts to reduce emissions, despite their limited success
  • The statement might benefit those arguing against EU environmental policies, while overlooking that the main driver of high emissions is the prioritization of GDP growth by governments [5]
  • The focus on aggregate numbers masks the significant inequality in emissions between different socioeconomic groups within the EU [3]
  • The statement doesn't mention that attempts at "green growth" have failed to reduce resource use at the scale required to address environmental breakdown [5]
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?