Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: +2.7°C is only the new "conservative" estimate. James Hansen is predicting 4.5 to 4.8°C by 2100.

Checked on February 26, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement accurately reflects James Hansen's current predictions, though the full context is more complex. Hansen indeed predicts warming of 4.5-4.8°C by 2100 [1] [2], which is significantly higher than previous IPCC estimates of 3°C [1]. His longer-term predictions suggest temperatures could rise between 8°C and 10°C above pre-industrial levels over several hundred years [3]. The immediacy of the situation is highlighted by the fact that 2024 was the first year global temperatures exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

  • Hansen's track record is contested, with some sources noting that many of his previous climate models and forecasts have not accurately predicted temperature changes [5]
  • There are significant uncertainties in climate modeling, even while acknowledging the possibility of Hansen's predictions being accurate [6]
  • Hansen believes the 2°C target is now "impossible" and expects temperatures to reach 2°C by 2045 [7] [8]
  • The climate appears to be more sensitive to CO2 than previously thought [2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

While the statement itself isn't misleading, it presents Hansen's predictions without important caveats:

  • It doesn't mention that there's scientific debate about the accuracy of these predictions
  • The statement could benefit various stakeholders:
  • Climate action advocates could use these higher estimates to push for more urgent policy changes
  • Climate skeptics could point to Hansen's previous prediction track record to dismiss these estimates [5]
  • Research institutions might benefit from increased funding for climate research due to heightened concerns
  • The presentation of 2.7°C as "conservative" needs to be contextualized against the IPCC's previous estimates of 2.5°C to 4°C [2], as it sits within this range rather than being notably conservative
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?