Could North Sea drilling trigger Norwegian landslide
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Scientists say the last giant Storegga submarine landslides off Norway happened around 8,400–6,200 years ago and produced tsunamis; modern seismic triggers include earthquakes or over-steepened glacial sediments, not routine drilling [1] [2]. Current reporting shows active North Sea drilling permits and planned wells by Equinor and others in 2025–2026, but none of the supplied sources claim exploration drilling has been demonstrated to trigger a Storegga-scale collapse [3] [4] [5].
1. The ancient Storegga precedent: an immense natural failure, not a drilling accident
The geological event often cited is the Storegga slides — among the largest known submarine landslides — which involved hundreds of kilometres of continental shelf collapse and generated tsunamis in the North Atlantic millennia ago; scholars date major phases to roughly 8,400–7,800 years ago (some sources give ca. 6,225–6,170 BCE) and attribute the event to widespread slope failure of glacially derived sediments [1] [2]. Research that reevaluated the sequence of events also emphasizes that large submarine failures are complex, can happen in multiple pulses over thousands of years, and are linked to long-term sediment loading and post‑glacial processes rather than single short-term human actions [6].
2. What actually triggers submarine landslides, according to the scientific record
The literature points to natural triggers for giant slope collapses: massive sediment accumulation from melting glaciers, structural weakening over millennia, and earthquakes that can tip a marginally stable slope into failure [2] [6]. Phys.org reporting on more recent reassessments notes that parts of the Norwegian shelf moved in different episodes separated by thousands of years, undercutting a simple single-trigger narrative and highlighting the role of long-term sediment and ice‑age histories in preconditioning failures [6].
3. Modern North Sea drilling: active, regulated, and small‑scale relative to geological volumes
Contemporary offshore activities noted in the reporting — Equinor and partners receiving permits, semi‑submersible rigs like COSL Innovator conducting pilot holes, and plans to drill dozens of exploration/appraisal wells in 2026 — are typical industrial operations in water depths of a few hundred metres and borehole depths of several kilometres [3] [5] [4]. These operations are orders of magnitude smaller in energy and mass transport than Storegga‑scale slope failures, which moved vast volumes of the continental shelf [1] [2]. The Norwegian authorities (Havtil and the Offshore Directorate) are cited as granting permissions and overseeing operations [3] [7].
4. Can drilling trigger a Storegga‑scale landslide? Evidence and limits of current reporting
None of the supplied sources document a direct causal chain from routine exploration or production drilling to a Storegga‑type collapse. The scientific accounts emphasize slow sediment processes and seismic triggers over thousands of years, while the operational reports focus on permitting and planned well counts [6] [3] [4]. Available sources do not mention any instance where contemporary North Sea drilling has induced a giant submarine landslide equivalent to Storegga.
5. Known examples of Norwegian landslides and what they teach us
Recent onshore and coastal landslides in Norway demonstrate that slope failure remains a hazard — for example, the 2020 Alta slide that swept buildings into the sea and the 2025 Nesvatnet rail collapse where satellite data suggested years of minute ground movement before failure — but those are shallow terrestrial quick‑clay or slope instabilities, not continental‑shelf collapses triggered by offshore drilling [8] [9]. These events underline that monitoring matters and that different types of landslides have distinct causes and scales [8] [9].
6. Competing perspectives and regulatory context
Industry reporting frames drilling as subject to national oversight and routine permitting (Havtil approvals, operator responsibility) and describes substantial planned drilling activity [3] [4]. Scientific sources warn that submarine mass movements are “more complex and more frequent than previously thought,” implying the need for improved geological understanding and monitoring [6]. The two perspectives intersect: regulators permit activity but the scientific record urges caution given geological complexity — a tension present in the sources [3] [6].
7. Bottom line and what to watch for next
Based on the supplied reporting, a Storegga‑scale landslide driven directly by routine North Sea drilling is not supported by the sources; the ancient Storegga collapses were products of long-term sedimentation and seismicity, and contemporary drilling is much smaller in scope [1] [2] [3]. To assess risk credibly going forward, look for peer‑reviewed geotechnical studies of specific shelf sectors, public environmental impact assessments tied to the permits cited, and any monitoring data that show slope instability near active drill sites — none of which are present in the supplied material [3] [6].