Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What are the projected CO2 concentration levels by 2050 according to climate models?

Checked on November 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Climate models and scenario analyses produce a wide range of projected atmospheric CO2 concentrations for mid‑century because outcomes depend entirely on future emissions pathways and policy choices: some model-based scenario families project roughly 490–1,260 ppm by century’s end and several reports single out ~550 ppm by 2050 under high‑emission continuations (most commonly cited figures include ~550 ppm by 2050) [1] [2] [3]. Short‑term model families used by agencies (IEA, EIA, IPCC) focus more on emissions (GtCO2) and net‑zero timing—these drive the concentration numbers, but available sources show materially different mid‑century CO2 levels across scenarios [4] [5] [6].

1. Why “models” give very different CO2 levels by 2050

Climate models translate emissions into concentrations through carbon‑cycle assumptions and then into temperature through climate sensitivity; different scenario inputs (business‑as‑usual vs. stringent mitigation) therefore yield very different answers. The SRES/long‑range literature gives a total 21st‑century CO2 range of about 490–1,260 ppm depending on socioeconomic pathways [1]. Agency and research reports focus on emissions trajectories (gigatons of CO2), not a single concentration number, because atmospheric CO2 in 2050 depends on the cumulative emissions pathway and on carbon‑sink behavior [4] [5].

2. Common headline numbers you’ll see for 2050 and where they come from

A widely cited mid‑century concentration often reported is roughly 550 ppm by 2050 under “continue current trends” or high‑emissions scenarios; Yale Climate Connections and Carbon Brief summaries reference figures on the order of 550 ppm for mid‑century under such trajectories [2] [3]. Older comprehensive scenario families and synthesis reports show broader ranges into the hundreds of ppm by mid‑to‑late century, reflecting uncertainty in emission control and feedbacks [1].

3. Emissions projections link but are not identical to concentration projections

Many contemporary reports present emissions in GtCO2 for 2050 (e.g., IEA’s STEPS ~32 Gt CO2 in 2050, EIA side cases from ~35 to ~48 GtCO2, or McKinsey’s Achieved Commitments scenario showing ~11 GtCO2 by 2050) rather than a single ppm number; those different emissions outcomes would imply very different atmospheric CO2 concentrations depending on the carbon cycle and timing [4] [5] [7]. Translation from emissions to ppm requires a carbon cycle model—hence why climate‑model literature reports a concentration range rather than a unique figure [1] [4].

4. What the IPCC and policy‑oriented scenarios emphasize

The IPCC’s pathways that limit warming to 1.5°C generally require CO2 emissions to reach net zero around mid‑century (~2045–2055), meaning atmospheric CO2 would stabilize or decline in those pathways rather than continue rising to very high mid‑century values [6]. In contrast, scenarios that do not achieve net zero or that follow historically rising emissions imply substantially higher concentrations by 2050 and beyond [6] [1].

5. Impacts tied to specific concentration thresholds in reporting

Storytelling and impact studies often pick representative concentration milestones. For example, Carbon Brief summarized research linking rising CO2 concentrations to crop nutrient declines and referenced scenarios in which CO2 reaches levels that, when combined with other forcings, imply harmful outcomes; their reporting includes a mid‑century focus where CO2 growth drives added nutritional risk [3]. Yale Climate Connections cites a projection that continuing emissions could yield ~550 ppm by 2050, a figure used to illustrate the risk of long‑term high‑CO2 climates [2].

6. Where the uncertainty comes from — and what that means for a single “2050 ppm” answer

Uncertainty stems from (a) socioeconomic choices and pledges (which determine future emissions), (b) how much carbon land and ocean sinks absorb, and (c) model differences in climate sensitivity and carbon‑cycle feedbacks. Because of that uncertainty, authoritative sources present scenario ranges (e.g., 490–1,260 ppm across SRES families) rather than a single best‑estimate ppm for 2050 [1]. Reports that present emissions numbers (GtCO2) rather than ppm make explicit that policies—if implemented—can cut mid‑century emissions sharply [7] [8].

7. Bottom line and how to read future headlines

If the world follows high‑emission business‑as‑usual paths, several outlets and scenario summaries indicate mid‑century CO2 could reach roughly the 500–600 ppm band (commonly cited ~550 ppm), while ambitious mitigation and net‑zero pathways aim to stabilize concentrations much lower or even begin to reduce them—however, the literature provides a spectrum from roughly 490 ppm up into the high hundreds or beyond depending on scenario [2] [3] [1] [6]. For a precise ppm number tied to a specific policy pathway, consult the scenario tables in the IPCC/IEA/EIA model output or studies that explicitly convert emissions pathways to concentrations [6] [4] [5].

Limitations: available sources do not provide a single consensus ppm value for 2050; instead they report scenario ranges and emissions projections that must be converted to concentrations with carbon‑cycle models [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What emission scenarios (SSPs/RCPs) correspond to different CO2 concentration projections by 2050?
How do projected CO2 concentrations by 2050 vary across IPCC AR6 scenarios?
What are the expected atmospheric CO2 ppm levels by 2050 under current national pledges (NDCs)?
How will 2050 CO2 concentration pathways affect global temperature and extreme weather risks?
What mitigation measures could lower projected 2050 CO2 concentrations and by how much?