What regional countries account for the largest share of removals projected in 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
U.S. removals projected for 2025 are concentrated overwhelmingly in the Western Hemisphere, with Mexico and Central American countries accounting for the largest share, while other notable source countries in Latin America (Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, Brazil) make up a secondary but substantial portion; smaller but visible shares come from South and East Asia (India, China) and selected other origins, according to reporting and government statistics [1] [2] [3] [4]. These patterns reflect both longstanding migration corridors and 2025 policy changes — including expanded third‑country removal arrangements — that re‑direct and amplify removals to particular regional partners [5] [1].
1. Mexico and Central America: the bulk of projected removals
Multiple reporting and policy analyses indicate Central America — together with Mexico — will receive the lion’s share of removals in 2025, with Central American states described as “continuing to receive the majority of deportees” under expanded U.S. arrangements and enforcement operations [1] [6]. Government data and media mapping of ICE arrests show high arrest volumes for Mexico and nearby countries, reinforcing that removals are concentrated on familiar regional corridors rather than evenly dispersed globally [4] [2]. Policy shifts that enable third‑country returns and new agreements with regional governments also make it administratively easier to send large numbers back to Mexico and Central America [5] [1].
2. Broader Latin America: Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru and Brazil figure prominently
Beyond Mexico and the Northern Triangle, reporting cites rising removal counts to several South American countries in 2025: Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru and Brazil all appear among the more frequently cited origin countries in ICE arrest and removal tallies, with some outlets reporting hundreds to thousands of deportations for these nations in 2025 [2] [3]. The surge for certain countries — notably Venezuela — is tied to both increased arrivals and targeted enforcement priorities, and is amplified where diplomatic arrangements or airline access permit repatriation flights [3] [6].
3. Asia and other regions: visible but smaller shares
Asian countries such as India and China register smaller but non‑negligible shares of removals in 2025; one compilation reported modest increases for India and fluctuating counts for China, and media datasets list arrests of Chinese and other non‑Latin American nationals among ICE activity [3] [2]. These flows are nevertheless much smaller in absolute terms than removals to neighboring Western Hemisphere countries, and data in public reporting treat Asian origin removals as a minority slice of total U.S. removals [3] [4].
4. Policy changes reshape destination shares — but reporting varies
The projected geography of removals in 2025 is not only a product of migration flows but of policy: expanded “third‑country” removal arrangements and new diplomatic agreements mean some countries accept non‑nationals from U.S. custody, altering the distribution of where people are sent [5] [1]. Sources caution that official tallies mix arrests, removals, and policy declarations, so headline counts can diverge by outlet; ICE publishes enforcement and removal statistics, but advocacy and media reporting provide different emphases and sometimes higher‑level summaries of country‑level impacts [4] [6].
5. Limits and competing narratives in the data
Available reporting makes clear that while the Western Hemisphere accounts for the largest share of projected removals in 2025, precise country rankings and totals vary across sources: ICE’s public statistics describe enforcement priorities and removals broadly [4], migration policy analysts emphasize the Central American concentration and diplomatic leverage [6] [5], and aggregated compilations cite country‑by‑country counts that can differ in methodology and provenance [3] [1]. Where sources conflict or lack full transparency, reporting limits prevent definitive enumeration beyond the firm conclusion that Mexico and Central American countries account for the largest share, followed by other Latin American states and smaller contributions from Asia [1] [2] [3].