Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Can South Australia really run on renewables in 2027
1. Summary of the results
Based on the available analyses, South Australia's goal to run on 100% renewable electricity by 2027 appears achievable. The state has already made significant progress, currently generating 71-74% of its annual electricity demand from wind and solar [1]. This represents a dramatic increase from just 1% renewable generation 16 years ago [2]. The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) has even suggested this target could be reached by 2026 [1], with projections showing approximately 85% renewable generation by 2025/2026 [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several important factors support this transition:
- Infrastructure Development: The state is investing in new transmission infrastructure and large-scale wind and solar projects [1]
- Energy Storage Solutions: Battery storage systems are being implemented [1]
- Hydrogen Integration: Growing hydrogen production plans are part of the strategy [1]
- Accelerated Timeline: This target actually represents an acceleration of the previous 2030 goal [3]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question's phrasing "really run on renewables" might suggest skepticism, but it's important to note:
- The target is for "net 100% renewable electricity generation" [3], not constant 100% renewable power
- The state government and AEMO, both significant stakeholders, express confidence in this goal [3] [1]
- The transition is backed by concrete infrastructure plans and existing progress [1]
Beneficiaries of this narrative include:
- Renewable energy companies and investors in wind/solar projects
- Battery storage manufacturers
- Hydrogen industry stakeholders
- The South Australian government, which can claim environmental leadership
- Environmental advocacy groups
It's worth noting that traditional energy providers and fossil fuel industries might have opposing viewpoints, though these weren't represented in the provided analyses.