Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Inflation wasnt effected much by the 2018 35 day government shutdown
Executive summary
The 35‑day partial shutdown of Dec. 22, 2018–Jan. 25, 2019 had measurable but small effects on output and did not, in available reporting, cause large swings in headline inflation; the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated real GDP was about $3 billion lower in Q4 2018 and $8 billion lower in Q1 2019 (0.1% and 0.2% of quarterly GDP, respectively) [1]. Federal statistical agencies and analysts warned the shutdown interrupted the collection and publication of inflation and jobs data—creating uncertainty that complicated policymaking—even if the direct hit to inflation measures was limited in the official estimates [2] [3].
1. The small direct output hit: CBO and BEA measurements
The nonpartisan CBO quantified the shutdown’s direct drag on production rather than on inflation per se: it estimated delayed discretionary spending of roughly $18 billion and reduced real GDP by $3 billion in Q4 2018 and by $8 billion in Q1 2019—about 0.1% and 0.2% of quarterly real GDP, respectively [1]. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) explains that government shutdowns most directly affect the “federal government consumption expenditures” component of GDP and that many impacts on private consumption or investment cannot be separately identified in the national accounts, so headline GDP effects can be isolated only to certain components [2].
2. Why that matters (or doesn’t) for inflation readings
Available government calculations and mainstream reporting focus on output and data gaps rather than claiming a large, measurable change in CPI inflation from the shutdown itself. BEA and CBO work show the shutdown shaved economic activity but do not present evidence of a material direct change in broad price indexes; if anything, the primary documented impacts were on levels of activity and timing of spending, not on a sustained transmission into headline inflation [1] [2]. News outlets and analysts emphasize that the bigger risk was reduced visibility for price data—missing or delayed CPI and jobs releases—that complicated interpretation of inflation trends [3] [4].
3. The data blackout: uncertainty as a policy risk
Multiple outlets flagged that the shutdown “cut off the flow” of official statistics—monthly jobs, CPI and other releases were delayed or not published—making the Federal Reserve’s job harder because it had to rely on private-sector proxies for inflation and labor market strength [3] [5]. Commentators warned the absence of timely data raised the risk of policy mistakes and increased market uncertainty, even if the shutdown’s direct macroeconomic bite was modest [3] [6].
4. Divergent estimates and market concerns
While the CBO’s quantified GDP drag was small, private-sector firms and financial institutions produced broader scenario estimates and warned of larger, more persistent effects if shutdowns lengthened. For example, EY and some investment banks produced higher-impact scenarios and noted that prolonged shutdowns could have meaningful consequences for inflation-linked markets or for growth if furloughs and contractor disruptions persisted [7] [8]. This illustrates a recurring tension: official statistical agencies measure the immediate accounting impacts conservatively, while market analysts weigh second‑round effects and sentiment channels that can amplify outcomes [8] [7].
5. What consensus looks like — and its limits
The clearest consensus in the sources is that the 2018–19 partial shutdown slightly reduced measured real GDP and that the most concrete, documented consequence for inflation was uncertainty from missing data rather than a large, demonstrable jump or drop in CPI readings [1] [2] [3]. Limitations are explicit: BEA says many shutdown effects on GDP components “cannot be quantified” because they are embedded in source data [2], and news outlets stress that missing releases could distort future CPI calculations and policy decisions [6].
6. Bottom line for the original claim
Saying “inflation wasn’t affected much by the 2018 35‑day shutdown” is consistent with the available official evidence: CBO and BEA emphasize a modest GDP hit and data disruption rather than a clear, large effect on inflation measures [1] [2]. However, reporting and analyst commentary stress that the shutdown’s most important economic effect was the loss of timely inflation and jobs data—creating uncertainty that could indirectly influence monetary policy and markets [3] [5] [6].