Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What income limits determine eligibility for ARPA enhanced premium tax credits in 2023–2025?

Checked on November 21, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

ARPA temporarily removed the ACA’s 400% of the federal poverty level (FPL) upper-income cutoff for premium tax credit (PTC) eligibility for 2021–2022 and those enhanced rules were extended through the 2023–2025 coverage years by later legislation, meaning households with incomes above 400% FPL could qualify for subsidies in 2023–2025 when the benchmark plan would otherwise cost more than 8.5% of income [1] [2] [3]. Under ARPA/its extensions, the out-of-pocket contribution cap was lowered to at most 8.5% of household income for determining PTCs [4] [2].

1. What changed: the 400% FPL cap was suspended, then extended

Before ARPA, people with household income above 400% of the federal poverty level were ineligible for marketplace premium tax credits. ARPA “temporarily eliminated” that 400% upper limit for tax years 2021 and 2022 [5] [6]. Congress then extended ARPA’s expanded eligibility and larger credit amounts through the 2023–2025 coverage years via subsequent budget/reconciliation action [1] [3]. The Congressional Research Service and IRS summaries explicitly describe the elimination of the 400% cutoff and the later multi-year extension [1] [5].

2. How eligibility is determined in practice: income relative to FPL and the 8.5% affordability test

With ARPA/its extension in force for 2023–2025, eligibility hinges on household income measured as a percentage of the FPL and whether the benchmark (second-lowest-cost Silver) plan’s premium exceeds a capped share of income. Specifically, the ARPA approach capped a household’s required premium contribution at no more than 8.5% of income — so if the benchmark premium would cost more than 8.5% of household income, the household can qualify for a PTC even if its income exceeds 400% FPL [4] [2]. CMS and IRS materials describe the 8.5% cap as a central ARPA change that enabled higher-income households to qualify [4] [2].

3. What returns in 2026 if no further action is taken

Analysts and official summaries note the expanded eligibility and enhanced subsidy percentages were explicitly temporary; absent further Congressional action, the upper 400% FPL limit and pre-ARPA contribution percentages would revert [1] [7]. Congressional products and CRS tools explain that beginning in 2026 the ACA’s original income bands and required contribution percentages would come back into effect [8] [7].

4. Who benefits and how much: examples and headline impacts

Reporting and advocacy analyses show the changes substantially increased coverage affordability for both low- and higher-income households. Under ARPA, people at or below 150% FPL could have zero-dollar premiums for some plans, while households above 400% FPL could receive credits if premiums exceeded the 8.5% cap [2] [9]. CRS and other analyses estimated billions in additional outlays to finance the expanded PTCs and quantified millions of enrollees who would face higher premiums if the expansions lapsed [1] [9].

5. Competing perspectives and policy trade-offs

Supporters argue the temporary suspension of the 400% cutoff and the 8.5% cap made insurance affordable for many who otherwise would be priced out, boosting enrollment and reducing uncompensated care [9] [2]. Critics and fiscal analysts point to the significant federal cost: CBO and JCT estimated extension of ARPA’s PTCs for 2023–2025 would increase outlays by tens of billions and reduce federal revenues substantially over the projection window [1] [10]. Policy analysts also warn of a potential “subsidy cliff” if the rules revert in 2026, creating sharp losses of assistance for households just above 400% FPL [11].

6. Practical takeaways for consumers and tax filers

For 2023–2025 coverage years, consumers should evaluate eligibility based on projected household income for the coverage year and FPL percentages; those with incomes above 400% FPL may still qualify if the benchmark premium would exceed 8.5% of income [3] [4]. The IRS and Marketplace reconcile advance payments versus final PTCs at tax time, so accurate income estimates matter [5] [4]. If Congress does not extend ARPA’s provisions beyond 2025, the 400% cutoff and earlier contribution percentages will resume in 2026, potentially changing eligibility and subsidy amounts [1] [7].

Limitations: available sources explain the policy framework and estimated impacts but do not list every 2023–2025 FPL dollar thresholds by household size in these snippets; for specific dollar cutoffs per family size or a precise subsidy calculation you should consult IRS/CMS guidance or marketplace calculators (not found in current reporting).

Want to dive deeper?
What are the exact income thresholds (as percent of FPL) for ARPA enhanced premium tax credits in 2023, 2024, and 2025?
How did the American Rescue Plan Act change premium tax credit eligibility compared with pre-ARPA rules?
Are there special income rules for households with access to employer-sponsored insurance under ARPA enhancements?
How do household size and state Medicaid expansion affect ARPA enhanced premium tax credit eligibility?
What documentation and income verification are required when claiming ARPA-enhanced premium tax credits on a 2023–2025 tax return?