Have any federal policies under the Biden administration changed mortgage eligibility for undocumented immigrants?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
HUD has issued guidance and press statements in 2025 saying non‑permanent residents will no longer be eligible for FHA single‑family Title I and II programs, reversing earlier Biden‑era agency guidance that had allowed some noncitizen borrowers such as DACA recipients with work authorization and a valid Social Security number to access FHA loans (HUD press materials; reporting summarized by National Review and CIS) [1] [2] [3]. Other federal actions and interagency guidance from the Biden era — notably a 2023 joint CFPB/DOJ statement cautioning lenders against blanket denials based on immigration status — remain part of the record and are cited by critics as having influenced lender treatment of noncitizen borrowers [2] [4] [5].
1. HUD’s 2025 policy rollback: what changed and who it targets
HUD announced changes that eliminate the “non‑permanent resident” eligibility category for FHA single‑family Title I and II programs and stated that aliens without permanent resident status will not be eligible for FHA‑insured mortgages; HUD framed the change as reversing a Biden‑era policy that allowed DACA recipients with work authorization and a Social Security number to seek FHA loans [1] [3]. HUD’s public statements also describe a new partnership with DHS aimed at preventing noncitizens from receiving federal housing benefits and say HUD will update its Single Family Housing Policy Handbook 4000.1 to reflect the change [6].
2. What the Biden‑era guidance actually said
Available reporting and agency summaries indicate that, in the Biden years, HUD and the FHA adopted guidance allowing certain noncitizen borrowers — specifically DACA beneficiaries who could demonstrate lawful work authorization and a valid Social Security number — to apply for FHA‑insured mortgages; that guidance was cited by critics and later referenced as the policy being reversed by HUD in 2025 [2] [1]. The Congressional Research Service summary notes that noncitizen eligibility for federally guaranteed single‑family mortgages has varied across administrations and agency guidance, and that some Trump actions were later reversed during the Biden administration [7].
3. The CFPB/DOJ 2023 intervention: lender obligations and controversy
In October 2023 the CFPB and DOJ issued a joint statement warning lenders that “unnecessary or overbroad reliance” on immigration status in credit decisions can violate fair‑lending and other laws; that guidance does not itself create affirmative eligibility for FHA programs but cautions private creditors about blanket bars based solely on status — a point senators and industry voices criticized as pressuring lenders to consider creditworthiness irrespective of immigration status [2] [5] [4]. Republican lawmakers and some industry commenters have framed that guidance as effectively forcing loans to noncitizens; those critics point to potential safety‑and‑soundness and enforcement concerns [4] [8].
4. Competing narratives and political context
HUD’s 2025 announcements are presented by the department and allied outlets as restoring prioritization of citizens for taxpayer‑backed housing benefits and cracking down on “illegal alien exploitation” of programs [6] [1]. Opponents of HUD’s reversal — including groups that emphasized civil‑rights or consumer‑protection rationales during the Biden guidance — argued earlier that blanket exclusions could run afoul of anti‑discrimination law and harm credit access for legally authorized noncitizens; those earlier protections were the basis for the CFPB/DOJ cautions [2] [5].
5. Legal and administrative limits: what the sources do and do not show
Congressional analysis makes clear that rules on noncitizen eligibility vary by statute, agency, and program, and that administrative guidance — not new legislation — has driven much of the shifting treatment of noncitizen borrowers [7]. Available sources do not mention any new Congress‑passed law changing eligibility; they attribute the most recent change to HUD administrative guidance and interagency coordination with DHS [7] [6] [3].
6. Where the debate goes next — oversight and political theater
Republican lawmakers and HUD officials have framed the policy shift as an enforcement priority and tied it to broader critiques of immigration’s impact on housing affordability; House and Senate Republicans have used letters and press releases to press for oversight into use of federal housing funds for noncitizens [9] [6]. Fact‑checking and academic sources cited in the broader debate examine immigration’s complex role in housing markets and caution about simplified causal claims — but those analytic discussions are separate from the administrative eligibility question HUD addressed [10] [11].
Limitations: this summary relies only on the provided documents and reporting; available sources do not mention specific implementing regulatory text changes in the FHA handbook beyond HUD’s statements, nor do they show litigation or court rulings resolving these directives [3] [1].