Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How do billionaire tax rates in the US compare to other developed countries in 2025?
Executive Summary
Billionaires in the United States have faced declining effective tax rates in recent years, with studies showing the richest Americans paying substantially lower overall rates than in the past, while proposals for wealth or global minimum taxes could raise meaningful revenue if adopted more broadly. Comparisons with other developed countries are mixed: some OECD peers rely more on capital gains and inheritance tax changes or are considering wealth levies, but available analyses show no uniform pattern that places U.S. billionaire taxation consistently above peers in 2025 [1] [2] [3]. This briefing extracts the core claims, contrasts U.S. trends with policy moves elsewhere, and highlights gaps where cross‑country harmonized data are lacking. [4] [5]
1. Bold claims extracted: who says what and why it matters
Analyses assembled claim three main points: first, the ultra‑rich in the U.S. are paying lower effective tax rates than they did a decade ago, with the top 400 Americans’ effective rate falling from 30% to 23.8% in the periods studied; second, academic proposals for targeted wealth or billionaire taxes could raise nontrivial revenue, potentially amounting to a few tenths of a percent of GDP; third, some national policy changes in other developed countries—capital gains adjustments, inheritance reforms, or property levies—are being considered or enacted that would affect the tax burden on the wealthy [1] [2] [5] [3]. These claims converge on the idea that current U.S. tax outcomes for billionaires are shaped by sheltering mechanisms and asset‑based wealth accumulation, and that policy levers exist but vary substantially by country.
2. What the U.S. evidence shows: falling effective rates and sheltering dynamics
Recent U.S.-focused studies document a sharp decline in the effective tax rates of the richest households. Research cited finds the effective tax rate for the 400 wealthiest Americans dropped from roughly 30% in 2010–2017 to 23.8% in 2018–2020, attributing the decline to greater ability to shelter business and investment income and lower reported taxable income among the ultra‑rich [1] [6]. The U.S. pattern described emphasizes that statutory rates alone do not capture true tax exposure; effective tax outcomes depend on income composition, use of unrealized gains, and tax planning strategies. This nuance means headline top rates are a poor proxy for what billionaires actually pay, and that U.S. declines reflect structural features of wealth taxation rather than simply changes in statutory marginal rates [2].
3. How comparators like the UK and Canada are moving: tax tinkering, not a single model
Comparative materials indicate other developed countries are pursuing a mix of approaches rather than a uniform shift toward higher billionaire taxation. The U.K. in 2025 debated inheritance and capital gains reforms, including lifetime caps on tax‑free gifts and property‑linked levies on high‑value homes, targeting wealth transmission and real estate rather than introducing a universal billionaire income tax [3]. Canada’s recent fiscal moves include raising capital gains inclusion and altering marginal rates, even as it cuts a low bracket to benefit middle incomes; policy changes in Canada affect wealthy payers but are balanced against broader tax relief measures [7] [8]. Across developed countries, changes are piecemeal and politically calibrated, producing varied outcomes for billionaires depending on each country’s tax base and enforcement.
4. Proposals for a global minimum or wealth tax: revenue potential and limits
Several analyses modelled the impact of a global minimum tax on ultra‑wealthy individuals or a small annual wealth levy and estimated meaningful but modest revenue relative to GDP. One study estimated a 2% annual minimum on billionaire wealth could generate revenue equating to roughly 0.22% of global GDP in 2025, rising slightly by 2030, while targeted national versions could yield sums comparable to existing wealth tax collections in some OECD countries [4] [5]. These projections show the policy toolbox could move material resources to governments, but results depend on coverage, valuation rules, enforcement, and cross‑border coordination. Absent broad international cooperation, unilateral measures face avoidance and relocation risks.
5. What’s missing, political stakes, and takeaways for readers
The evidence package highlights data gaps and political constraints that make cross‑country comparisons difficult: available studies focus on top U.S. households or model global scenarios rather than provide harmonized tax‑incidence estimates across jurisdictions. Key unknowns include consistent measures of effective tax rates for billionaires across countries, the role of unrealized gains in wealth reporting, and the administrative feasibility of wealth levies, all of which shape whether the U.S. is an outlier or part of a wider trend [6] [2]. Policymakers considering reforms face tradeoffs between revenue, evasion risk, and political feasibility. For now, the clearest facts are that U.S. ultra‑rich effective tax rates have fallen recently and that international proposals could raise funds but require coordinated design to avoid circumvention [5] [4].