Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
$
Fact check: Blackrock controls the military industrial system
Checked on February 27, 2025
1. Summary of the results
The claim that "BlackRock controls the military industrial system" is not supported by the available evidence. BlackRock's actual role is that of an investment management firm that:
- Offers ETFs related to aerospace and defense stocks [1]
- Functions primarily as an investment analysis firm observing economic and fiscal trends [2]
- Operates as one of many financial institutions making investments in various sectors [3]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:
- The military-industrial complex is historically a much broader concept, originated by Charles Wright Mills and popularized by President Eisenhower, representing a complex network of relationships between military, political, and industrial actors [4]
- BlackRock's actual involvement in military-related investments is more nuanced:
- They primarily function as an asset manager investing in indexed securities [3]
- Their investment decisions are influenced by geopolitical events like the Ukraine war and resulting defense budget increases [2]
- They have investments in companies with connections to various military sectors, including Chinese military and technology sectors [3]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement demonstrates several problematic aspects:
- It oversimplifies the complex nature of the military-industrial system, which historically involves multiple actors and relationships [4]
- It misrepresents BlackRock's role as controlling rather than participating through investment management [1]
- It ignores the broader context of global investment patterns and geopolitical influences on military spending [2]
Those who might benefit from promoting this narrative include:
- Critics of large financial institutions seeking to portray them as more powerful than they are
- Competitors in the financial sector looking to create distrust in BlackRock
- Political actors seeking to simplify complex military-industrial relationships for rhetorical purposes
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?