Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Tell me about Blackstone and real page algorithmic pricing

Checked on August 27, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses reveal that Blackstone, through its subsidiary LivCor LLC, is currently facing a major federal lawsuit alongside five other large landlords for participating in an alleged algorithmic pricing scheme using RealPage's software [1] [2]. The Justice Department has filed an amended complaint alleging that these landlords used RealPage's pricing algorithms and engaged in direct communication with competitors about rents and occupancy rates, which constitutes a nationwide rental price-fixing scheme [1] [2].

RealPage's algorithmic pricing system is at the center of these allegations, with sources indicating that the software enables landlords to share confidential information and align their rents in violation of antitrust laws [3]. The system allegedly pushes rental prices beyond what landlords could otherwise achieve through normal market competition [4]. The scope of this impact is substantial, with an estimated 800,000 leases in Washington alone being priced using RealPage software between 2017 and 2024 [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several crucial pieces of context that emerge from the analyses:

  • Blackstone's broader pattern of tenant treatment: Beyond the current lawsuit, Blackstone has faced years of scrutiny for its treatment of tenants and has been accused of profiting from rent hikes and evictions [5]. Specifically, Blackstone increased rent by 38% at properties it acquired in the San Diego area [5].
  • Scale of alleged harm: The lawsuit alleges that this pricing scheme has "caused harm to millions of renters" across the United States, indicating this is not an isolated issue but a systemic problem [1] [2].
  • Multiple defendants: The case involves six of the largest landlords in the country, not just Blackstone, suggesting this is an industry-wide practice rather than the actions of a single company [1] [2].
  • Blackstone's other real estate activities: The analyses also show that Blackstone operates other real estate investment vehicles like BREIT (Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust), which appears to be separate from the algorithmic pricing controversy [6] [7] [8].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears neutral and factual, simply asking for information about the relationship between Blackstone and RealPage's algorithmic pricing. However, there are no apparent biases or misinformation in the phrasing of the question itself. The question appropriately seeks clarification on a legitimate legal and business matter that is currently the subject of federal litigation.

The analyses consistently support the existence of this controversy across multiple sources, with government agencies taking formal legal action, which lends credibility to the underlying claims about the algorithmic pricing scheme's existence and alleged anticompetitive effects.

Want to dive deeper?
How does Blackstone's algorithmic pricing impact real estate market trends?
What is the role of data analytics in Blackstone's real page pricing model?
Can Blackstone's algorithmic pricing be applied to other investment sectors beyond real estate?
How does Blackstone's pricing strategy compare to other private equity firms in the real estate market?
What are the potential risks and benefits of using algorithmic pricing in real estate investment trusts?