Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the main categories of federal funding received by California in 2025?
Executive Summary
Federal funding accounted for roughly $175 billion in California’s 2025–26 state budget, representing over one‑third of total state spending, with health and human services — largely Medi‑Cal — receiving the vast majority of federal dollars (about $136.6 billion) and other federal flows supporting labor, education, transportation, housing, disaster recovery, and environmental programs [1]. The governor’s proposed 2025–26 budget highlights large federal shares for Medi‑Cal and related safety‑net programs but does not provide a line‑by‑line catalog of every federal funding category; secondary federal streams include K–12 and higher education aid, workforce and labor funding, transportation grants, environmental and disaster assistance, and various student and small business federal aid programs [2] [1] [3] [4]. This summary synthesizes those primary categories and notes where public documents leave gaps.
1. Extracting the central claims: who says what and why it matters
The primary, recurring claim across budget summaries is that almost four in five federal dollars to California flow to health and human services, with Medi‑Cal as the single largest recipient; the 2025–26 baseline cited is approximately $136.6 billion directed to those programs while the total federal inflow included in the state budget is roughly $174–175 billion [1]. Other explicit claims enumerate federal support for social safety‑net programs such as CalWORKs, food assistance, child welfare, foster care, and adoption assistance, as well as targeted housing programs like the CalWORKs Housing Support Program and Bringing Families Home [2] [5]. These claims matter because federal funds shape state service delivery and fiscal capacity, and concentration in health and human services creates fiscal dependencies that carry policy implications for future state budgeting and program stability [1] [2].
2. Reading the numbers: Medi‑Cal dominates, but totals conceal variety
The budget materials and commentary emphasize that Medi‑Cal comprises the largest single slice of federal funds, with individual figures varying in reporting [1]. Statements place Medi‑Cal and related Department of Health Care Services funding in the triple‑digit billions while the remaining federal funds are distributed among departments such as Social Services (e.g., $11.6 billion cited in one breakdown), labor, education, transportation, and environmental protection [1]. These aggregated totals accurately reflect the fiscal reality that federal reimbursements and entitlement funding drive much programmatic spending, yet they obscure the multiplicity of federal grant mechanisms — entitlements, formula grants, competitive grants, and disaster loans — that reach the state and local levels, each with different timing, matching rules, and restrictions [1] [3].
3. The other federal buckets: education, infrastructure, environment and disaster aid
Beyond health and human services, authoritative documents and portals point to K–12 and higher education federal aid, Pell Grants and work‑study, transportation and infrastructure grants, environmental protection funding, and disaster assistance as meaningful categories of federal support to California [4] [3] [6]. Education funding appears in the governor’s budget through both state‑administered and federally funded programs, while transportation financing includes federal formula dollars and competitive grants, and environmental funding covers regulatory program grants and project money. Disaster assistance — including Small Business Administration disaster loans and FEMA grants — represents a distinct federal funding channel for wildfire and other catastrophe responses that can spike in given years and are administered separately from the state budget core [3] [4].
4. What the governor’s budget shows — and what it leaves unclear
The governor’s proposed 2025–26 budget explicitly allocates substantial federal dollars to Medi‑Cal and lists multiple human services programs by name, including CalWORKs Housing Support and the Home Safe Program, but it does not provide a comprehensive, labeled breakdown of every federal funding category by source and program [2] [1]. The California Grants Portal offers program‑level grant information but is not a consolidated federal‑fund inventory, producing potential gaps for analysts seeking a complete mapping of federal receipts across state agencies [6]. This absence of a single public ledger means different public documents can present overlapping but nonidentical snapshots — useful for triangulation but requiring careful cross‑checking to avoid double‑counting intergovernmental transfers [1] [6].
5. Reconciling sources, agendas, and practical takeaways
Published budget summaries and portals reflect consistent factual anchors — total federal inflows near $174–175 billion and a heavy concentration in health and human services — but they also reflect differing emphases: executive budget documents emphasize programmatic allocations and policy priorities while grant portals and federal agency pages emphasize available awards and disaster loans [1] [2] [6] [3]. Stakeholders advancing policy reforms or budgetary changes may highlight different elements: health advocates point to Medi‑Cal’s federal backing as protection for services, whereas fiscal conservatives might underscore the reliance on federal funding for recurring state obligations. Analysts should therefore use multiple documents together, verify line items against federal award notices when possible, and treat the governor’s budget as authoritative for state spending plans while supplementing it with federal agency data for categorical detail [1].