How do California Lottery 2nd Chance entry odds compare across Scratchers vs. draw games?
Executive summary
California’s 2nd Chance program gives similar mechanical entry rates for many products—Scratchers and SuperLotto Plus generally award one 2nd Chance entry per $1 spent, while Fantasy 5 requires $5 of tickets for a single entry—yet the true odds of winning hinge not on that entry rate alone but on the total pool size, promotional structures, and participation behavior that vary sharply between Scratchers and draw-game pools [1] [2] [3].
1. How entry rules map to “odds” on paper
The Lottery’s published rules make a clear, simple conversion: most Scratchers yield one entry per $1 spent and SuperLotto Plus entries follow the same per-dollar rule, whereas Fantasy 5 entries are issued one per $5 of tickets purchased, and special Scratchers promotions may grant entries at the ticket’s price point (e.g., a $10 ticket gives 10 entries) [1] [4] [3]. The state also caps user submissions—up to 500 codes per month—and treats codes with multiple embedded entries as a single submission for administrative purposes, which constrains how many effective entries any individual can legally generate in a short window [1]. These structural rules determine theoretical entry power but do not by themselves set winning odds.
2. Why equal entry rates don’t mean equal winning chances
The Lottery explicitly states that “odds of winning depend on the total number of entries, the number of entries you’ve submitted and the number of prizes awarded for each draw,” meaning identical per-dollar entry rules produce different chances when the pools differ in size or prize count [5]. In practice, Scratchers 2nd Chance draws can produce massive entry pools—external reporting cited a weekly Scratchers draw with just over 12 million entries competing for a limited set of prizes—so an entry from a $1 Scratcher in that pool faced long odds [2]. Conversely, some draw-game or high-price Scratchers promotions attract fewer participants; where fewer players enter, the same single entry buys proportionally better odds [6].
3. Participation behavior and game economics reshape outcomes
Independent analysts and lottery-adjacent sites note that Scratchers participation in 2nd Chance varies by game price, promotion attractiveness, and ease of entry, with evidence from other states that only a minority of losing tickets get entered—sometimes single-digit percentages—improving odds for those who do submit [6]. California reports millions of participants in its 2nd Chance program overall, but it also runs multiple weekly pools and promotional drawings that segment entries by game and timeframe, so players concentrated in niche or promotional draws can face very different competition than the general Scratchers pool [1] [7].
4. Practical implications for a player seeking better 2nd Chance odds
The tangible takeaways are straightforward: per-dollar, Scratchers and SuperLotto Plus often give equivalent entry weight, while Fantasy 5 is less efficient on a per-dollar basis because it bundles entries by $5 increments [1] [2]. However, better odds often depend on chasing smaller pools—promotional draws tied to specific Scratchers or lower-visibility games can yield materially better chances than large statewide weekly Scratchers pools, and the Lottery posts draw-specific results and prize counts so players can compare pool size versus prizes before entering [4] [7].
5. Limits of available reporting and where uncertainty remains
Public materials from the California Lottery describe the rules, submission limits, expiry windows (Scratchers codes generally expire 180 days after a game’s end), and where to view draw winners, but they do not publish a continuous, game-by-game running tally of current entries in every 2nd Chance pool that would allow precise, live odds comparisons across every Scratchers game and draw product [8] [5] [7]. Independent aggregators and state examples suggest variability in participation and occasional huge pools, but exact, up-to-the-minute entry totals that would let one compute precise odds for each contest are not available in the cited sources [2] [6].