Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What estimates did the Congressional Budget Office give for subsidy losses in 2025?

Checked on November 10, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

The Congressional Budget Office did not produce a single, consolidated figure labeled “subsidy losses in 2025” for federal health‑insurance subsidies; instead, CBO provided decade‑long reductions in federal Medicaid outlays under several policy options and separate 2025 estimates of subsidy costs for federal credit programs. For Medicaid policy options, CBO reported reductions measured over 2025–2034 rather than a specific 2025 year estimate, and for federal credit programs CBO estimated the lifetime subsidy cost of loans issued in 2025 as $2.4 billion by FCRA accounting and $65.2 billion by fair‑value accounting [1] [2]. This distinction between time‑span reporting and program‑specific 2025 estimates is central to interpreting what the CBO did and did not report [3] [4].

1. Why the CBO’s Medicaid numbers don’t answer “2025 losses” directly

CBO’s letter and options analysis present the projected gross reduction in federal Medicaid outlays over the 2025–2034 decade for five policy options, not a single-year 2025 subsidy loss. The five options show large decade totals — for example, Option 1 reduces federal Medicaid outlays by $860 billion over 2025–2034 and Option 2 by $880 billion, with smaller totals for the other options — but those are cumulative projections for ten years and are not broken down into a stand‑alone 2025 figure in the cited material [1]. The analysis and reporting therefore create potential confusion when someone asks for “2025” losses: CBO framed the Medicaid impact across a decade, not as an annualized 2025 snapshot, and other CBO products referenced by researchers emphasize changes in uninsured populations years out rather than single‑year dollar losses [3] [5].

2. Where CBO did provide explicit 2025 subsidy figures — federal credit programs

CBO produced an explicit 2025 estimate when it assessed the cost of federal credit programs. For loans and loan guarantees newly issued in 2025, CBO estimated the government’s subsidy cost at $2.4 billion using the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA) approach and $65.2 billion using a fair‑value accounting approach. The largest share of those estimated subsidy costs in 2025 stems from education loans, with CBO flagging $16.3 billion (FCRA) and $22.1 billion (fair‑value) attributable to the Department of Education’s new lending [2]. These are explicit single‑year estimates for costs associated with 2025 issuance, and they differ sharply by accounting method, which matters for comparisons and fiscal interpretation [2] [4].

3. How reporting choices shape what looks like “losses” versus “savings”

CBO’s messaging separates reductions in federal Medicaid outlays (which some stakeholders call subsidy “losses”) from deficit changes and from single‑year credit subsidy costs. For the Medicaid options, CBO reported both the gross reduction in Medicaid outlays over 2025–2034 and the estimated deficit reduction amount; for instance, Option 1’s $860 billion reduction in outlays is paired with a $710 billion deficit cut figure, reflecting interactions with revenues and other budget components [1]. This dual reporting means that quoting a Medicaid “loss” without context can obscure whether one cites outlay reductions, deficit impact, or annual versus cumulative effects, and CBO’s documents emphasize the decade framing rather than isolated 2025 dollar losses [1] [6].

4. Alternative indicators CBO did report that relate to coverage and timing

While CBO did not give a single 2025 subsidy‑loss number for Medicaid, it did provide estimates about coverage changes and projected trends in uninsured populations when policy changes affect Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act marketplaces. CBO projected that certain reconciliation changes would raise the number of uninsured by 10 million in 2034, with 7.5 million attributable to Medicaid changes and 2.1 million to marketplace changes, and it projected year‑by‑year effects in later years such as 2026 losses in coverage tied to expiring enhanced subsidies [3] [5]. These coverage metrics are relevant to subsidy discussions because reduced enrollment or program contraction is the mechanism behind lower federal outlays across the decade, even if CBO did not convert those dynamics into a standalone “2025 subsidy loss” for Medicaid in its cited reports.

5. Bottom line for someone seeking a single 2025 subsidy‑loss number

If you want a single 2025 dollar estimate, CBO produced such figures for federal credit program subsidies issued in 2025 (FCRA: $2.4 billion; fair‑value: $65.2 billion) but did not produce a single, explicit “subsidy loss in 2025” for Medicaid in the materials cited — instead providing cumulative 2025–2034 Medicaid outlay reductions under multiple policy options [2] [1]. To get a precise Medicaid dollar figure for just 2025, you would need either a CBO table that disaggregates the decade totals to single years or a follow‑up CBO query; absent that, the correct interpretation is that CBO reported decadal Medicaid reductions and program‑specific 2025 credit subsidy estimates, and mixing those distinct outputs would misrepresent what CBO actually published [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What factors contributed to CBO's projected subsidy losses in 2025?
How do 2025 subsidy losses impact the federal budget deficit per CBO?
Which specific subsidies are most affected by 2025 losses according to CBO?
When was the CBO's latest report on 2025 budget estimates released?
How have CBO subsidy projections for 2025 changed from previous years?