What happened to COLA and pay‑table timing during past government shutdowns or CPI release delays, and how were retirees and employees affected?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A government shutdown that furloughed Bureau of Labor Statistics staff delayed the release of the September CPI-W, which in turn postponed the Social Security Administration’s usual mid‑October COLA announcement for 2026 [1] [2]. Despite the announcement delay, the SSA and multiple analysts said beneficiaries’ payments themselves would be made on schedule and any COLA, once calculated, would be reflected in January checks — the disruption was timing and communication, not an immediate cut to benefits [3] [4] [2].
1. What was delayed and why: the mechanics of CPI, COLA and a furloughed BLS
The COLA for Social Security is calculated from the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI‑W) by comparing the average of July–September to the same period a year earlier, and the September CPI is therefore crucial to the October announcement [1] [5]. When the government shutdown began, most BLS employees were furloughed and the BLS suspended data collection and scheduled releases, including the September CPI, creating the direct procedural cause of the COLA announcement delay [3] [1] [2].
2. Historical context: past shutdowns produced delays but not permanent payment interruptions
Previous shutdowns have pushed back CPI releases and COLA announcements but did not ultimately stop COLA adjustments from taking effect; for instance, the 2013 delay moved announcements to late October but benefits and subsequent COLA application were preserved, and the 2018–2019 lapse similarly did not change payment timing [6] [7]. Agencies maintain contingency plans acknowledging that a delayed CPI release “might have an impact” on the announcement timetable, a pattern evident across multiple shutdown episodes [1] [5].
3. How the SSA and payroll systems handled timing: announcements vs. payments
The Social Security Administration and retirement-policy analysts repeatedly stated that benefits are funded via mandatory spending and will continue to be paid on schedule during a shutdown, and that once BLS data are available the SSA will calculate the COLA and have the new amounts reflected in January payments [4] [8] [2]. The SSA also has contingency systems to issue payments as soon as data permit, and officials reassured beneficiaries that the increase would still take effect in January even if the announcement came later [9] [3] [4].
4. Concrete effects on retirees and employees: uncertainty, planning and Medicare interactions
For recipients the immediate harm was informational: millions faced days or weeks without a confirmed percentage to plan household budgets, and that uncertainty can matter for people on fixed incomes weighing expenses and health‑care choices [10] [6]. There is an added wrinkle where Medicare Part B premiums and IRMAA surcharges can offset the effective gain from a COLA for higher‑income beneficiaries — meaning some individuals’ net increase could be reduced even though benefits are not cut, via premium recalculations rather than SSA benefit reductions [11]. Analysts and advocacy groups projected the 2026 COLA in roughly the mid‑2 percent range, so the practical numeric change was anticipated, even as the precise announcement waited on BLS data [9] [12] [10].
5. Wider ripples: markets, indexing and the politics of timing
Beyond individuals, delayed CPI data complicate markets and valuation of inflation‑indexed securities and Treasury yields that use CPI inputs for pricing, and the lack of a timely official inflation figure increases uncertainty for investors and fiscal planners [9] [1]. Politically, the delay offered opponents and advocates of COLA‑formula changes an opening to reframe debates about the CPI measure used for seniors, with groups like AARP and the Senior Citizens League using the pause to reiterate calls for alternative indexes and to publish projections [10] [12].
6. Bottom line and limits of the record
The record across reporting is consistent: shutdown‑related BLS furloughs delayed the CPI release and thereby postponed the COLA announcement, but mandatory‑funded Social Security and SSI payments continued and any COLA would be applied to January checks once the data were processed [1] [4] [2]. Estimates of the 2026 COLA clustered around 2.5–2.8 percent, but projections are not a substitute for the official figure and the sources relied on contingency plans, agency reassurances and historical precedent rather than policy changes that could have altered payments [9] [12]. Reporting reviewed did not document any case in which a shutdown permanently reduced COLAs or delayed actual payments beyond their scheduled dates, and further detail about internal SSA processing timelines or individual beneficiary IRMAA outcomes beyond these summaries was not available in the cited coverage [6] [11].