Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which countries allow 40- to 50-year mortgage terms and what are their eligibility requirements?
Executive summary
Long mortgage terms (40–50 years) exist in several countries — commonly cited examples include the UK, Japan, Spain, France and Finland — but uptake and product details vary widely and long terms often make up a small share of the market [1] [2]. U.S. debate over a proposed 50‑year mortgage intensified in 2025; proponents point to lower monthly payments while critics warn of higher lifetime interest and underwriting challenges for very long amortizations [3] [4] [5].
1. Where 40–50 year mortgages are reported to exist — the quick list
Contemporary reporting and commentary name several countries where lenders have offered very long amortizations: the UK and Japan are repeatedly mentioned as markets with 40–50 year options [6] [2], Spain and France have been cited as allowing terms “up to 50 years,” and Finland has even been reported to offer up to 60‑year products in limited cases [1]. Global mortgage‑rate surveys also catalogue the longest available fixed terms by country, although they do not by themselves supply standardized eligibility rules [7] [1].
2. What “existence” means in practice — niche vs. mainstream
Multiple sources stress that very long terms often represent niche offerings rather than dominant practice: Maxwell’s survey notes that 50‑year and longer products have a low market share even where they exist [1]. Reuters’ reporting on Europe describes a pullback from boom‑era ultra‑long loans, with many markets capping terms at 40 years and lenders tightening loan‑to‑value ratios [8]. In short, a country “allowing” a 50‑year loan does not mean most borrowers use one [1] [8].
3. Typical eligibility and underwriting considerations reported
Available sources discuss several recurring underwriting themes for long terms: lenders weigh borrower age and ability to service payments over many decades, loan‑to‑value limits are tighter in some markets, and regulators or banks may cap maximum terms [8] [5]. Coverage of the U.S. proposal highlights underwriting difficulty for younger borrowers — e.g., a 40‑year‑old would still be 90 at payoff — and critics say that makes some lenders and regulators uneasy [5]. However, concrete, country‑by‑country eligibility checklists (credit score thresholds, precise maximum LTV, income ratios) are not enumerated in the available reporting (available sources do not mention exact country‑by‑country eligibility grids).
4. Tradeoffs: lower monthly payments vs. greater lifetime cost
Analysts and journalists point to two predictable effects: extending amortization reduces monthly principal-and-interest payments (Fannie Mae’s calculator example shows notable monthly savings moving from 30 → 40 → 50 years) but increases total interest paid and slows equity accumulation [3] [4]. The push for longer terms in the U.S. has been framed as a way to improve affordability for younger buyers, but opponents argue it doesn’t solve supply constraints and could leave households paying interest for many more years [3] [5].
5. Politics and advocacy around introducing 50‑year loans in the U.S.
The 2025 debate in the U.S. involved the White House and housing officials considering a 50‑year product as a policy tool; proponents called it one “weapon” among others to help affordability, while the idea drew immediate public and media criticism [3] [4]. Coverage notes friction inside policy circles and rapid backlash on social media and among economists [4] [5].
6. International comparisons — why context matters
Opinion pieces and comparisons often invoke Japan and the UK as working examples, but those countries’ mortgage markets differ in lender behavior, borrower protections, tax regimes and average loan structures, so transplanting a product doesn’t guarantee similar outcomes [2] [1]. Historical reporting also shows that during boom periods some European lenders stretched terms (even to 50–60 years) and later scaled them back as risk perceptions changed [8] [1].
7. What the available reporting does not provide (important caveats)
The sources here do not provide comprehensive, current country‑by‑country eligibility rules (exact maximum ages, LTV caps, minimum credit scores, or regulator‑imposed affordability tests); they report presence, usage patterns and debate rather than full regulatory details (available sources do not mention detailed eligibility tables). For precise lending criteria in any given country, one must consult local regulators, major banks or up‑to‑date mortgage‑market surveys [7].
8. Bottom line for readers weighing long terms
Long amortizations are offered in multiple countries and can lower monthly payments, but they are often niche products with higher lifetime interest, underwriting constraints tied to age and LTV, and policy debates about whether they address core housing supply and affordability problems [1] [3] [5]. If you want country‑specific eligibility rules, the current reporting points to where products exist but does not replace direct inquiries to lenders or local supervisory guidance (available sources do not mention full eligibility rules).