Which countries have successfully reduced national debt and how long did it take?

Checked on December 1, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Only a handful of countries have near-zero or very low external public debt: sources list Liechtenstein and Niue as effectively debt‑free, and IMF/Statista and Visual Capitalist data show many small economies with very low debt‑to‑GDP ratios in 2023–2025 (e.g., the “lowest debt” lists) [1] [2] [3]. Long, sustained national debt reductions at scale are rare; most reporting emphasizes levels and ratios in single years and highlights rising global debt ($111 trillion, 94.7% of GDP in 2025) rather than multi‑decade success stories [4] [3].

1. Countries that actually show minimal or no sovereign debt

WorldPopulationReview reports only two sovereign states believed to be completely free of debt: Liechtenstein and Niue [1]. Statista’s listing of the 20 countries with the lowest national debt (IMF data) documents other countries with very low debt‑to‑GDP ratios in recent years, but those are “lowest debt” rankings rather than narrative case studies of sustained reduction [2].

2. What most major datasets actually measure — and why “reduced debt” is hard to spot

Major compilations (IMF, OECD, Visual Capitalist, Wikipedia lists) measure government debt as gross public debt and report snapshots or time series of debt‑to‑GDP ratios; they show which countries have high or low ratios but do not typically frame long runs of deliberate national debt reduction as single “success stories” [5] [3] [4]. Visual Capitalist’s 2025 mapping emphasizes that global public debt rose to $111 trillion (94.7% of GDP) and highlights high‑debt countries like Japan (230% of GDP), not a parade of countries that steadily cut debt over a decade [4] [6].

3. Common paths that countries use to reduce debt (overview from historical and policy reporting)

Policy literature and explanatory pieces list the standard tools: sustained budget surpluses, rapid economic growth that increases the denominator (GDP), one‑off asset sales or privatizations, inflation that erodes real debt burden, and—in extreme cases—debt restructuring or default (investopedia overview of government methods and RAND historical work) [7] [8]. The sources link these methods to historical episodes (for example, U.S. post‑World War II debt reduction via growth and fiscal restraint) but do not offer a modern, multi‑country ranked list of successful debt reductions measured over identical horizons [8].

4. Examples often cited — limited context in available reporting

Some narratives point to post‑war reductions (e.g., U.S. after WWII) or countries that temporarily lowered debt ratios during boom years; RAND’s work examines how the U.S. reduced its debt burden after WWII and models pathways to similar reductions today [8]. The IMF/Statista and Visual Capitalist materials list low‑debt countries in 2023–2025 but do not document the policy mix and timelines that produced those low ratios for each country [2] [3].

5. Why timelines vary and why direct comparisons mislead

Debt‑to‑GDP change depends on policy choices, economic shocks, and starting conditions. The OECD and IMF data underline that refinancing, interest costs, and maturing debt change the outlook quickly; the OECD warns that a large share of sovereign debt will mature in the next few years, complicating sustained reduction [9]. Visual Capitalist shows rapid shifts in global numbers between 2024–2025 [4]. Because sources provide snapshots and forecasts rather than standardized multi‑decade case studies, you cannot reliably say “Country X reduced its national debt in Y years” across the board from the available material [3] [4].

6. Competing perspectives and hidden agendas in the reporting

Data aggregators (WorldPopulationReview, Visual Capitalist, Statista) present headline rankings that can be read as success lists, but those pieces do not always explain structural differences (small tax bases, sovereign wealth, currency arrangements) that let tiny states appear “debt‑free” [1] [2] [3]. Policy actors (e.g., RAND, CBO, OECD) frame reductions through policy levers and emphasize tradeoffs; advocacy groups like the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget offer interactive “debt fixer” scenarios that model idealized choices rather than document historical multi‑country causation [8] [10] [9].

7. Practical takeaway for your question

If you want a list of jurisdictions with very low or negligible sovereign debt today, use the IMF/Statista “lowest debt” lists and WorldPopulationReview’s note about Liechtenstein and Niue as starting points [2] [1]. If you want verified timelines showing deliberate, sustained national debt reduction (country X reduced debt from A% to B% in N years with documented policies), available sources do not provide a consolidated, source‑cited catalogue; instead consult the IMF, OECD, and country treasury historical data series and policy analyses for individual case studies [5] [9].

Limitations: the sources supplied are snapshots, visualizations, and policy overviews; they emphasize levels and drivers rather than producing a uniform, cross‑country list of “successful debt reductions with years taken.” For concrete timelines you will need country‑by‑country historical debt series from IMF/TradingEconomics/official treasuries referenced above [5] [11].

Want to dive deeper?
Which countries reduced debt-to-GDP the fastest since 2000 and what policies drove it?
How did Ireland and Iceland lower national debt after their banking crises and how long did recovery take?
What role did economic growth versus fiscal consolidation play in reducing sovereign debt in postwar Germany?
Which emerging markets successfully cut public debt without deep recessions and which reforms enabled it?
What lessons from Japan, Greece, and Argentina explain long-term debt reduction challenges?