Does converting traditional IRA to Roth increase taxable income for Medicare Part B/D premiums?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Yes — converting a traditional IRA to a Roth creates a taxable event that raises that year's taxable income (MAGI), and Medicare Part B and D premiums are set based on MAGI from two years earlier, so a conversion can push someone into IRMAA brackets and increase premiums [1][2][3].
1. How the mechanics work: conversion = taxable income this year, MAGI drives Medicare two years later
When funds move from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA the converted amount is treated as taxable income in the year of conversion, increasing adjusted gross income and therefore modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) used by Medicare [1][4]. Medicare bases Part B and Part D IRMAA surcharges on MAGI reported on the tax return from two years prior, so a conversion today can translate into higher Medicare premiums in the year two years after the conversion [2][3].
2. The practical consequence: a one‑year spike can raise premiums for multiple years
Because IRMAA uses a two‑year lookback, a large one‑time Roth conversion that boosts MAGI can cause higher Part B and D premiums starting two years after the conversion and lasting until the agency reexamines later tax years, potentially adding hundreds of dollars per person per month depending on the bracket [5][6][7]. Financial planning writeups and calculators repeatedly show examples where staggered conversions or a single large conversion materially increase monthly Part B and Part D bills under current IRMAA brackets [5][7].
3. Strategies and tradeoffs documented by financial outlets
Advisers and outlets recommend mitigation tactics — converting gradually over years to keep MAGI within desired IRMAA brackets, timing conversions before Medicare enrollment so the spike falls outside the lookback window, or using other tax maneuvers to lower reported MAGI — while noting that those choices trade current taxes for future premium risk and that the long‑term Roth benefits (no RMDs, tax‑free withdrawals) often justify conversions when done thoughtfully [6][8][9]. Analysts also stress that IRMAA brackets are “all‑or‑nothing” within a band, so small income differences can produce abrupt premium jumps [6].
4. Appeals and exceptions social safety nets allow — limited and specific
If income falls due to a qualifying life‑changing event (retirement, marriage, divorce, death of a spouse, etc.), beneficiaries can file SSA Form SSA‑44 to request reconsideration of IRMAA, but routine one‑year income spikes like Roth conversions are not automatically treated as life‑changing events that negate a surcharge [1][2]. Several sources caution that appeals are possible but not a guaranteed fix and should not be relied upon as a planning strategy for predictable conversion income [2].
5. Bottom line and what’s left uncertain in reporting
The consensus in the reporting is unequivocal that Roth conversions increase taxable income in the year of conversion and that higher MAGI can trigger IRMAA surcharges on Medicare Part B and D two years later, so conversions can raise premiums unless timed or sized to avoid crossing thresholds [1][3][10]. The sources outline mitigation techniques and emphasize tradeoffs, but they do not—and the available excerpts do not—provide individualized tax outcomes or guarantee how future legislative or bracket changes might alter these dynamics, so precise premium effects require modeling personal tax returns against current IRMAA thresholds [5][7].