Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What economic indicators would prompt the Fed to announce a reset at the end of November 2025?
Executive summary
The Fed would most likely signal a "reset" (i.e., a pivot toward rate cuts or a materially different forward guidance) if incoming data showed persistent weakening in labor markets and clear disinflation, while growth slowed—especially if data that had been delayed by the government shutdown confirmed those trends (jobs softening, lower CPI/PCE readings, and weaker GDP or spending). Recent reporting shows the Fed is divided and awaiting catch-up data on employment, inflation, retail spending and growth before deciding on cuts; that uncertainty is central to any end‑of‑November decision (Reuters) [1], and delayed data complicate the picture (New York Times) [2].
1. What “reset” means for markets and policy
A Fed “reset” commonly means a shift from a tightening stance to signaling probable rate cuts or a clear conditional path for future easing; such a shift would be anchored in the FOMC statement and the Summary of Economic Projections (dots) published at the meeting or in adjacent communications (Federal Reserve press materials and calendars) [3] [4]. Market tools like CME’s FedWatch would immediately reprice the probabilities of near‑term cuts if officials pointed to rising downside risks to employment or a sustained fall in inflation [5].
2. Labor market indicators that would matter
The Fed has repeatedly pointed to employment as a central part of its mandate; Reuters reporting highlights that one core axis of the internal Fed divide is whether slowing job growth warrants cuts even if inflation remains sticky [1]. Concretely, a reset would be prompted by consecutive weaker employment reports—slowing payroll gains, rising unemployment rate, or downward revisions to prior months’ payrolls—especially if those revisions materially change the Fed’s assessment that “downside risks to employment rose” (as the Fed itself noted when cutting previously) [3] [6].
3. Inflation and wage dynamics the Fed will watch
The committee is watching inflation measures (CPI, PCE) and wage growth. The Fed won’t act on anecdote: it needs evidence of disinflation across headline and core readings, and easing wage pressures that suggest inflation won’t re‑accelerate. Reuters and Fed commentary show policymakers want a fuller suite of inflation and labor data before cutting, so a clear decline in core inflation metrics in the delayed reports would be a decisive trigger [1] [3]. Available sources do not mention a specific numeric threshold that would force a cut.
4. Growth and spending signals — GDP, consumption, nowcasts
A slowing in GDP and consumer spending helps justify cuts. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow nowcast (4.2% as of Nov. 21, 2025) is one real‑time input but is only a model; the Fed and markets will weigh official BEA releases and retail spending data as they arrive [7]. TBAC and Fed commentary note growth was "resilient but slowing" in 2025, and continued slowing—especially if private demand softens—would strengthen the case for a reset [6].
5. The role of delayed and revised data after the shutdown
Multiple sources stress that the government shutdown created a data gap; the timing and content of catch‑up releases will influence Fed decisions. Reuters reports the reopened government’s delayed reports could change policymakers’ risk assessments, and the New York Times warns late releases will carry caveats that complicate decisions [1] [2]. The Fed has signaled it may wait for these catch‑up reports to build confidence before cutting [1].
6. Financial market conditions and external signals
Beyond macro statistics, market indicators matter: falling Treasury yields, easing credit conditions, and equity market moves have already reflected some expectations of cuts (TBAC noted lower Treasury yields and revived equity prices after earlier cuts) [6]. If market signals show tightening strains easing or growth expectations dropping, the Fed could factor those in when framing a reset [6].
7. Politics, committee divisions and messaging tradeoffs
Reporting emphasizes a deep policy divide inside the Fed between officials prioritizing inflation risks and those more concerned with jobs [1]. Minutes and votes can reveal dissents (the Fed’s past statements recorded dissenting votes when lowering rates) and the Fed may choose a compromise: cutting but signaling a pause afterward, or waiting to cut until December—with quarterly projections that could reinforce either path [1] [3]. Readers should note that public- and market‑facing messaging is as important as the economic thresholds themselves.
8. Limits of available reporting and what we don’t yet know
Available sources describe which data categories the Fed is watching and the committee’s internal split, but they do not provide explicit numerical cutoffs (e.g., specific unemployment rate or inflation level) that would mechanically force a reset—those trigger points are not laid out in the cited material (not found in current reporting). The timing and content of delayed government releases remain uncertain and will be decisive in the coming weeks [1] [2].
Bottom line: a credible Fed “reset” at end‑November would require the delayed flow of employment and inflation data to show persistent labor weakening and clear disinflation, reinforced by slowing GDP or spending and market signals; Reuters and Fed materials make clear that those missing pieces are exactly what policymakers want before committing to a pivot [1] [3] [2].