How have recent federal pay raises compared to inflation and private-sector wage growth?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Federal employees received a relatively large across‑the‑board boost in early 2025—about a 4.5% average raise—yet that headline number sits uneasily beside multiple measures of price and private‑sector pay growth, producing mixed real‑wage outcomes depending on which comparison and index one uses [1] [2]. Analysts, labor leaders and policymakers interpret the same data very differently: some argue raises have begun to catch up to inflation and private wages, while unions and watchdogs say persistent gaps and sectoral winners leave many feds behind [3] [4] [5].
1. What the raw numbers show: recent federal raises vs. headline wage and price measures
The most-cited figure for federal pay in 2025 is an average 4.5% increase awarded in January, one of the largest single‑year bumps in recent memory [1], while the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Employment Cost Index for the 12 months ending September 2025 reports wages and salaries rising roughly 3.6% [2], and benefit costs up about 3.5% [2]; taken at face value, the federal raise slightly outpaced that broad ECI wage change but comparisons hinge on which index and time window are chosen [2].
2. The private‑sector picture: uneven but in many places stronger
Private‑sector wage gains in 2025 have been heterogeneous: tech, finance and some healthcare roles saw higher advertised and realized increases, and aggregate trackers show posted wages and median individual wage gains that often outstripped inflation for many workers—Indeed’s mid‑2025 analysis found posted wage growth above inflation for a majority of workers and flagged especially rapid gains at the high end of the earnings distribution [6], while Federal News Network and other analyses conclude federal raises have trailed private‑sector pay growth for more than a decade, a pattern that colors perceptions of the 2025 raise [4].
3. Compensation is more than base pay: competing methodologies produce competing conclusions
Economists and policymakers rely on multiple metrics—ECI, the Atlanta Fed’s Wage Growth Tracker, average hourly earnings and CBO comparisons of total compensation—and those measures can tell different stories because of sample composition, benefits inclusion and job‑mix shifts [7] [8]. The Congressional Budget Office analysis cited in reporting suggested the historical gap in combined pay and benefits between federal and private workers narrowed between 2015 and 2022, a finding that complicates union claims about a systemic federal shortfall depending on which cohorts and benefits are counted [3].
4. Politics and advocacy shape the debate—whose narrative does the data serve?
Union leaders and some Democrats pushed for much larger increases—package proposals as high as a roughly 7% total bump were floated—arguing federal pay remains far below private equivalents and that small raises would worsen recruitment and retention [5]; by contrast, the White House’s budget proposal at one point contemplated a more modest average 2% civilian raise tied to fiscal constraints, a stance that prompted criticism from unions and some lawmakers [9] [3]. These competing proposals reveal underlying agendas: unions emphasize parity and retention, while administration budget language stresses fiscal limits and long‑term pay policy tradeoffs [9] [5].
5. Bottom line and caveats: some federal workers gained ground, but the story is granular
Broadly, the 4.5% January 2025 federal raise was large enough to exceed several headline wage indices for the year, suggesting many federal paychecks saw a real‑term boost versus some measures [1] [2]; nevertheless, private‑sector wage gains have outpaced federal increases in key industries and for high‑skilled roles, and methodological differences—total compensation vs. base pay, locality adjustments, and which months are compared—mean the answer depends on which comparison one chooses [6] [3] [7]. Reporting is limited to the cited analyses; absent consistent, single‑source apples‑to‑apples comparisons across all job classes and benefits, claims that federal pay has definitively “caught up” or “fallen further behind” remain contingent on the metric and stakeholder perspective [3] [4].