How should heirs choose between an independent appraiser and a dealer who offers appraisal plus purchase services?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Choosing between an independent appraiser and a dealer who offers appraisal-plus-purchase turns on three pillars: the appraisal’s intended use (legal/tax vs. sale convenience), the risk of conflict of interest when the valuer also stands to buy, and the documentation and credentials required by courts, tax authorities or insurers (estate appraisals often require independent, USPAP‑compliant reports). Independent appraisers usually provide impartial, documented valuations favored in probate and tax settings, while dealers can offer speed and liquidity but carry a vested interest that heirs should scrutinize [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Decide the appraisal’s purpose and who will rely on it
Heirs must first identify the appraisal’s legal or practical role: settling probate, supporting tax filings, allocating assets among beneficiaries, or simply getting a quick market offer to liquidate items; state probate practice and IRS rules treat estate valuations differently from private sales, and appraisers must know the intended use before developing an opinion of value [1] [2]. If the valuation is for estate tax, probate records, or formal dispute resolution, courts and tax authorities typically favor formal, documented appraisals from credentialed appraisers that follow recognized standards [1] [5].
2. Independence and conflict of interest matter more when stakes are high
Professional standards expect appraisers to be independent, impartial and objective when performing valuation services, a requirement enshrined in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and echoed across appraisal guidance [3]. A dealer offering both appraisal and purchase has a built‑in financial incentive to undervalue and resell quickly; consumer guides and industry commentators warn that such dual roles can create a conflict of interest that undermines impartiality [4]. Where impartiality is required—estate division, tax compliance, insurance—an independent appraiser reduces the risk that a valuation will be challenged by other heirs or auditors [2] [6].
3. Check credentials, report format and legal acceptability
Independent appraisers are often licensed or certified and follow USPAP, producing reports that document methodology, comparable sales and qualifications—documents that probate courts, IRS examiners and insurers recognize [5] [3]. Heirs should verify the appraiser’s credentials and ask whether the report will meet the specific legal standard required for the estate matter; appraisal management firms and institutional rules also impose independence standards in lending settings, illustrating how formal requirements can dictate acceptable practices [7] [8].
4. When a dealer’s offer makes sense—and how to protect against bias
A dealer who appraises then offers to buy can be the fastest way to convert assets into cash, and for heirs seeking convenience or immediate liquidity that tradeoff may be acceptable; dealers also bring market expertise and an existing buyer network that can justify lower net proceeds in exchange for speed [2]. To protect against undervaluation, heirs can insist on a written, itemized appraisal independent of the sales contract, seek a second independent appraisal for comparison, or obtain multiple purchase offers to benchmark the dealer’s bid—practices that counteract the dealer’s inherent economic interest [4] [6].
5. Cost, timing and dispute resolution: pragmatic tradeoffs
Independent, formal appraisals typically cost more and take longer than a dealer’s quick offer, but they create a documented basis for estate settlement, tax reporting and disputes [2] [1]. If heirs anticipate disagreement, need IRS defense, or face court scrutiny, the upfront expense of an independent appraiser can prevent costly litigation later; conversely, if all heirs agree on selling quickly and accept a likely markdown for convenience, a dealer route can be defensible so long as transparency measures—written appraisals, multiple bids—are used [6] [9].
6. A checklist for a defensible decision
Select an independent appraiser when the valuation will be used for probate, tax, insurance or contested division and require USPAP‑compliant documentation and credentials [1] [3]. Consider a dealer’s appraisal-plus-purchase only when immediate liquidity trumps maximized value and then mitigate conflict risk by obtaining an independent second opinion, written methodology, and comparison offers [4] [6]. Where institutional rules or courts govern the process, follow those rules first—those standards will often mandate independence or specific report elements [7] [5].