How have companies used Cyprus and other offshore jurisdictions to retain links to Russian assets after 2022 exits?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Companies and professional intermediaries used Cyprus and other offshore jurisdictions after 2022 to preserve economic links to Russian assets by shifting ownership into opaque vehicles, exploiting new fund structures and jurisdiction shopping, and using professional services firms to execute rapid transfers just as sanctions landed [1] [2] [3]. The effect has been a cat-and-mouse game: some assets have since been frozen and regulators strengthened oversight, but investigative leaks and follow‑up reporting show techniques that have kept beneficial ownership hidden or delayed enforcement [4] [5] [6].
1. Rapid restructurings into Cyprus vehicles timed to precede or follow sanctions
Leaked files and subsequent reporting show advisers in Cyprus helping to move or re-title major holdings at exactly the moment sanctions were imposed — for example, PwC Cyprus was reported to have helped manoeuvre a near‑billion‑pound transfer on the day an oligarch was sanctioned, illustrating how professional services executed last‑minute restructures to put assets under family members or other nominees [3] [7]. ICIJ and Guardian reporting traced dozens of hurried transactions in early 2022 that materially altered ownership chains, a pattern consistent across multiple oligarch cases documented in the Cyprus Confidential leak [1] [8].
2. Use of secretive fund types and registered alternatives to obscure ownership
New or repackaged products promoted by Cyprus law firms — notably “registered alternative investment funds” (RAIFs) — were explicitly marketed as ways to avoid public disclosure of ultimate owners and have been used to hide luxury assets, including megayachts and real estate linked to sanctioned figures [9] [6]. OCCRP and other investigations found RAIFs and similar Cyprus‑registered funds taking over companies that held yachts and properties, leaving public beneficial‑ownership registries unable to reveal true controllers [6].
3. Jurisdiction shopping and the offshore ecosystem beyond Cyprus
Cyprus was part of a broader strategy of “jurisdiction shopping”: professional enablers routed assets through multiple permissive jurisdictions — British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Dubai, Luxembourg, Isle of Man and others — to exploit delays, legal gaps or lighter enforcement, a tactic flagged by RUSI and OCCRP analyses [2]. These cross‑jurisdiction chains complicated sanctions implementation and asset tracing, since ownership and control often sat behind layers of offshore vehicles across different legal regimes [2].
4. Professional enablers, political ties and the incentives to resist rapid change
Investigations document the central role of lawyers, accountants and corporate service providers — an industry in Cyprus historically intertwined with politics — helping wealthy clients create trusts, shell companies and complex corporate structures; that same network benefited from pre‑war flows of Russian money and has been accused of resisting or gaming regulatory change [5] [1]. Western governments and watchdogs subsequently branded some Cypriot nationals and firms as “enablers” and offered assistance to build domestic sanctions units, underscoring a political and reputational battle over enforcement [10] [5].
5. Enforcement, freezes and the limits of reform
Since 2022 Cypriot authorities and CySEC have frozen substantial sums — reporting cites over €1.2 billion in frozen Russian‑linked assets — and Cyprus has undertaken audits, licensing actions and pledged reforms after the Cyprus Confidential revelations, but critics argue enforcement remains uneven and structural secrecy persists despite upgrades to compliance ratings [4] [11] [12]. International cooperation — FBI, UK intelligence sharing and EU pressure — has increased scrutiny, yet investigative reporting shows many schemes designed to keep assets concealed or move them into jurisdictions or vehicles that slow down seizure [13] [5] [9].
6. Two readings: systemic change underway, but evasive techniques endure
Official claims of stronger frameworks and a “zero tolerance” posture in Nicosia coexist with detailed evidence that enablers successfully exploited product innovations and cross‑border secrecy to retain links to Russian wealth after 2022, meaning reforms may narrow channels but not eliminate them [1] [4] [6]. Reporting organizations — ICIJ, OCCRP, RUSI and national press — provide convergent accounts of methods used, while Cypriot officials and some industry actors stress legal uses of offshore structures and point to substantial bank deposit declines and new registrants as signs of change [14] [7].