How is the Federal Reserve structured and who appoints its leaders?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Federal Reserve is a decentralized system made of a seven-member Board of Governors in Washington, 12 regional Reserve Banks and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC); the Board’s seven governors are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate for staggered 14‑year terms, while the Chair and Vice Chairs are chosen from those governors for four‑year leadership terms [1] [2]. Regional Reserve Bank presidents lead their districts and sit on the FOMC (five voting presidents at a time); their reappointments and the Reserve Bank boards involve local directors and Board of Governors oversight [3] [4] [5].
1. How the Fed is structured: a three‑part system
The Federal Reserve System combines a central Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks and the policy‑setting Federal Open Market Committee. The Board of Governors oversees the system’s policy, supervision and communication; the 12 Reserve Banks run district operations and research; and the FOMC, which includes the seven governors plus five regional presidents, sets monetary policy through open‑market operations [1] [3] [6].
2. Who appoints the national leaders: President + Senate for governors
Seven members sit on the Board of Governors. By statute the President nominates governors and the Senate must confirm them; governors serve staggered 14‑year terms so that individual tenures cross administrations [1]. The Chair, Vice Chair and the Vice Chair for Supervision are selected by the President from among sitting governors and must also be confirmed by the Senate for separate four‑year leadership terms [1] [2].
3. Chair vs. governor: overlapping but distinct mandates
Legally, the Chair is a governor first and the system’s public face and policymaker second: the Chair presides at Board meetings and chairs the FOMC but their four‑year leadership term is independent of the 14‑year governor term. That design lets a Chair be re‑nominated multiple times so long as they remain a confirmed governor [1] [2].
4. Regional presidents: local appointment, national influence
Each of the 12 regional Reserve Banks has its own president and board of directors drawn from local communities. Reserve Bank presidents are reviewed and reappointed through processes involving their district boards of directors and the Board of Governors; those presidents participate in FOMC deliberations and, on a rotating basis, five regional presidents vote at any given FOMC meeting [4] [3] [5].
5. Who controls whom: checks, overlaps and gray areas
The Board of Governors has statutory oversight of Reserve Banks—appointing three directors at each Reserve Bank, designating Chair and Deputy Chair among those appointees, and participating in Reserve Bank president reappointments—so the national board has significant levers over regional governance [7] [4]. Yet legal analyses and commentary note ambiguity: the Board “could” remove a Reserve Bank president, but the law is unclear and a 2019 Office of Legal Counsel view is untested in court, creating a removal‑authority gray zone [8] [9].
6. Why the structure exists: balance of national independence and regional input
Congress deliberately framed the Fed as a hybrid: a centralized Board to provide national oversight and twelve regional Banks to ensure geographical and sectoral representation. Statutory language requires “fair representation of the financial, agricultural, industrial, and commercial interests and geographical divisions” when making appointments, reflecting a design to blend independence with local input [2] [5].
7. Political pressure, reappointments and recent developments
Recent events illustrate the political sensitivity of personnel decisions. The Board reappointed 11 Reserve Bank presidents unanimously in December 2025 following district reviews, a move observers said reduced near‑term political risk over leadership changes [4] [10]. Commentary and reporting note tensions when administrations signal intent to influence regional or leadership appointments, underscoring that personnel choices shape policy direction as much as votes [10] [11].
8. Limits of available reporting and practical implications
Available sources describe who appoints governors and chairs, the role of district boards in reappointments, and legal ambiguity about removal of Reserve Bank presidents, but they do not provide a definitive court precedent resolving removal power or a full playbook of emergency appointment powers—those questions remain rooted in statute, OLC opinion and evolving practice [9] [8]. Practically, the mix of long statutory terms for governors and rotating regional voting seats is built to make sudden political remaking of the Fed difficult, though not impossible [1] [3].
If you want, I can map current officeholders and upcoming vacancies against statutory term expirations to show where the next appointment fights are likely. Available sources do not mention whether you want that map (not found in current reporting).