Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are some carding sites that are legit
1. Summary of the results
The analyses reveal that there are no legitimate carding sites - all sources consistently report on illegal carding operations being shut down by law enforcement agencies. Russian authorities seized four major dark web carding sites including Sky-Fraud forum, Trump's Dumps, UAS Store, and Ferum Shop, which collectively generated over $263 million in illicit proceeds [1]. The largest darknet stolen credit card marketplace, UniCC, voluntarily closed after making an estimated $358 million in crypto-payments [2].
Law enforcement agencies have been actively dismantling these operations, with BidenCash carding market domains being seized in international operations [3] and the Try2Check platform for testing stolen credit cards being disrupted by US authorities [4]. The current carding ecosystem faces significant challenges with increased prices, decreased validity, and cyber criminals fearing for their future [5].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question fundamentally misunderstands the nature of carding activities. Carding refers exclusively to illegal activities involving stolen credit card information - there is no such thing as a "legitimate" carding site. The analyses show that:
- All carding sites operate illegally and are targets for law enforcement seizure [1] [6]
- Financial institutions and law enforcement agencies benefit from shutting down these operations to protect consumers and maintain financial system integrity
- Cybersecurity companies like ReliaQuest benefit from reporting on these threats as it demonstrates the need for their services [5]
- The carding market is experiencing significant disruption, with major platforms voluntarily closing due to law enforcement pressure [2]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains a fundamental misconception by asking for "legit carding sites." This phrasing suggests either:
- Lack of understanding that carding is inherently illegal activity involving stolen financial data
- Potential intent to engage in illegal activities by seeking platforms for credit card fraud
- Confusion between legitimate payment processing and illegal carding operations
The question normalizes illegal activity by using the term "legit" in connection with carding, which exclusively refers to criminal enterprises that steal and monetize credit card information. All sources confirm that carding sites are illegal marketplaces subject to law enforcement action [1] [7] [8] [6] [4], with no legitimate alternatives existing in this space.