What are the methodological differences between 'gross national debt', 'debt held by the public', and ten‑year approved borrowing estimates?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Gross national debt, debt held by the public, and ten‑year approved borrowing estimates are three related but methodologically distinct ways of measuring federal borrowing: gross debt is the arithmetic sum of all federal obligations (including what one part of government owes another), debt held by the public captures market borrowing that competes for private capital, and ten‑year borrowing estimates are forward projections of how much new market financing will be needed under current law and enacted budgets (projections produced by agencies such as the CBO) [1] [2] [3].
1. What “gross national debt” actually counts
Gross federal debt is a stock measure that sums virtually all federal debt obligations — specifically, the sum of debt held by the public plus intragovernmental debt such as Treasury securities held in Social Security and other trust funds — and is the headline number often reported by Treasury and advocacy groups [1] [2] [4]. That aggregation is simple arithmetic: it adds securities held outside the government to securities the Treasury issued to other federal accounts, producing a single nominal dollar stock that reflects cumulative past deficits and surpluses as well as federal credit programs [1] [5].
2. Why “debt held by the public” is measured differently and often preferred by economists
Debt held by the public isolates the portion of federal borrowing sold into capital markets and held by investors outside the federal government — including private domestic holders, foreign official accounts, and the Federal Reserve — and is therefore treated as the best indicator of how federal borrowing affects credit markets and private investment [6] [7] [8]. Economists and budget offices typically present debt held by the public as a share of GDP because that ratio measures the economy’s capacity to service the borrowing and the potential crowding‑out of private investment [9] [4].
3. The role and interpretation of intragovernmental debt (the difference between the two)
The gap between gross debt and debt held by the public is intragovernmental debt — Treasury IOUs held in federal trust funds and other government accounts — which represent liabilities to one part of government and assets to another, and therefore do not directly draw on private capital markets [4] [8]. That distinction drives debate and political messaging: advocacy groups and watchdogs sometimes emphasize gross debt to underscore aggregate obligations and long‑term fiscal pressures [1], while many analysts argue that intragovernmental holdings are bookkeeping across government accounts and should be read differently from market debt [8] [5].
4. What “ten‑year approved borrowing estimates” measure and how they’re produced
Ten‑year borrowing estimates are forward projections of deficits and net new borrowing the Treasury will need over a planning horizon; they are typically produced by analytical agencies (CBO, OMB) as part of budget outlooks and incorporate enacted law, economic assumptions, and demographic forecasts — for example, CBO’s 10‑year budget projections feed into long‑term outlooks and assume current law as of a cut‑off date [3] [9]. These estimates are methodological exercises that translate projected deficits into projected increases in debt held by the public (and thus future gross debt), and they explicitly depend on assumptions about interest rates, growth, and policy choices — meaning the headline ten‑year borrowing number can move materially as assumptions or enacted policy change [3] [10].
5. How the different measures shape policy debates and where agendas show up
Because each metric serves different analytical and political purposes, the choice of measure reflects an implicit agenda: gross debt highlights cumulative obligations and is rhetorically powerful for alarm and calls for broad fiscal reform [1] [4], whereas debt held by the public is emphasized by economists and budget offices when assessing macroeconomic effects and the government’s demand on credit markets [9] [8]. Ten‑year borrowing estimates, by contrast, are the operational inputs for planning and for debates over the debt limit and fiscal policy; they are subject to contestable assumptions and therefore become a battleground for competing narratives about the severity and solvability of fiscal pressure [3] [11].
6. Limits of the reporting and a quick guide to reading numbers
Public reporting is clear about the arithmetic definitions (gross = public + intragovernmental) and about why debt‑as‑a‑share‑of‑GDP matters, but sources differ in emphasis and in normative framing: watchdogs often stress the urgency implicit in large gross figures [1] [4], while government budget offices stress the economic relevance of debt held by the public and the sensitivity of ten‑year projections to assumptions [9] [3]. The available sources do not provide a single, authoritative definition for the informal phrase “approved borrowing estimates,” so readers should treat ten‑year figures as projections grounded in explicit assumptions rather than immutable facts [3].