Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the most common categories for GoFundMe campaigns?
Executive Summary
GoFundMe’s most commonly cited campaign categories across multiple analyses are medical/health, memorial/emergency/family & community, and education, with other recurring areas including small business relief, disaster response, veterans, and animals. Recent reports disagree on exact shares and growth areas but converge that medical‑related fundraisers dominate both in volume and dollars raised [1] [2] [3].
1. What claimants say are the “top” categories — a clear consensus on the big three
Multiple analyses presented in the dataset converge on a compact list of dominant categories: medical (health/medical expenses), memorial/emergency/family & community, and education. Several sources explicitly list Medical, Memorial, Emergency, Charity, Education and Faith as platform categories, and identify Medical as the highest‑volume category in both campaigns and dollars raised [1] [4]. Independent summaries and statistics reinforce Medical as the single largest bucket, with some reports quantifying medical fundraising in the hundreds of millions to billions of dollars over recent years [2] [3]. This consistency across sources establishes a firm baseline: medical and personal‑need fundraisers are the principal use case for GoFundMe.
2. Numbers vary, but the direction is uniform — health leads, education and disaster follow
Different reports provide different numeric emphases: one analysis records medical fundraising as roughly 33% of donations, another cites multi‑billion totals for medical spending in 2024, while a CharityWatch summary points to medical as the largest single category in a given year [2] [5] [3]. Education routinely appears as the second‑tier category, with figures such as ~12% of aggregate funds noted by industry summaries [2]. Disaster relief, memorial campaigns, and family/community drives populate the middle ranks. Across these variations the pattern is consistent: health‑related needs account for the largest share of both campaigns and dollars, education is a meaningful but smaller slice, and emergency/memorial/community categories surface frequently as high‑impact but episodic causes [6] [7].
3. Shifting trends: student debt, small businesses and emergent categories change the landscape
Recent year‑over‑year reporting highlights shifts in what people fundraise for: 2023 saw a notable surge in student loan assistance and small business survival campaigns driven by inflation and economic strain, with small business owners launching nearly 100,000 campaigns and student‑loan relief campaigns increasing roughly 40% in one report [8]. Other trend notes indicate growing attention to family & community campaigns and faster growth in categories like Animals and newlywed support across some periods [6] [8]. These signals show that while medical remains dominant, economic cycles and social events produce clear growth spurts in non‑medical categories that shift platform composition year to year.
4. Outliers and headline campaigns distort perceptions — big fundraisers don’t equal category volume
High‑profile campaigns — mass shooting victim funds, disaster relief drives, and viral memorials — generate enormous headlines and can raise millions, but they are outliers relative to daily campaign volumes [7]. Some sources list the platform’s largest-ever campaigns as examples that skew public perception of typical GoFundMe activity [7]. Statistical summaries emphasize that aggregate dollars can be concentrated in fewer large campaigns, whereas the majority of campaigns are smaller, often medical or family‑level fundraisers. This means ranking by total dollars raised and ranking by campaign count can tell different stories, and users should treat headline totals as exceptional rather than representative [3].
5. Methodology caveats: label inconsistency and category aggregation complicate comparisons
Comparisons across the provided analyses are complicated by differences in category labels, aggregation methods, and reporting periods. Some sources use platform category names (Medical, Memorial, Emergency), others group by theme (Health & Essentials, Family & Community), and still others report dollar shares or single‑year totals, creating apples‑to‑oranges issues [1] [6] [2]. Several summaries lack publication dates or use different annual cutoffs, which affects trend interpretation [4] [9]. The dataset also shows varying granularity: one source emphasizes campaign counts, another emphasizes funds raised. These methodological differences require caution when synthesizing a single ranked list.
6. Bottom line — what a reader should take away and where to look next
Synthesize the evidence: medical/health fundraisers are the dominant category on GoFundMe by both volume and dollars, followed by memorial/emergency/family & community campaigns and education; economic shocks elevate student debt and small business categories episodically [1] [2] [8]. For precise, up‑to‑date shares and year‑to‑year shifts, consult platform reports or third‑party analytics with explicit timeframes and methodology; reliance on headline totals risks overestimating the representativeness of a few viral fundraisers [3] [7]. These combined findings show both the stable core use (medical help) and the dynamic fringe driven by social and economic events.