Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
That number is not made up.The average American pays 36 dollars in taxes each year to fund food stamps.That same American pays 700 in taxes each year for corporate subsidies.
Executive Summary
The core claim — that the “average American” pays $36 annually for food stamps (SNAP) and $700 annually for corporate subsidies — is a mixture of numbers drawn from different years, definitions, and methodologies; parts of it trace to a 2012-era per-taxpayer calculation for SNAP but the corporate-subsidy figure is inconsistent across studies and dates. Recent analyses and summaries in the provided material show SNAP per-taxpayer contributions vary with the baseline population and year, while corporate-subsidy totals depend heavily on how “subsidy” is defined (direct payments, tax expenditures, loans, loan guarantees, or broad industry supports), producing estimates that range from hundreds to thousands of dollars per household depending on the study and time frame [1] [2] [3]. The claim simplifies complex budget accounting into two neat numbers that do not hold up under scrutiny across the available sources.
1. Where the $36 for food stamps came from — an old per-taxpayer snapshot that hides context
The $36 figure appears in multiple retrospective write-ups referencing a 2012 calculation that allocated SNAP (food stamp) outlays across taxpayers and gave a per-taxpayer contribution of about $36 for someone making roughly $50,000 a year; that figure reappears in analyses from 2016 and earlier and is often cited without caveats [1]. Those sources confirm a 2012-era calculation but note this is sensitive to the denominator used (all taxpayers versus households, versus adults versus total population), the year’s SNAP budget (which fluctuates with the economy and policy), and whether the calculation counts gross federal spending or net after benefits and administrative offsets [2]. Presenting $36 as a timeless, per-person tax burden omits these methodological choices and the fact that SNAP costs and taxpayer bases changed substantially after 2012, especially during economic downturns and pandemic-era expansions [4].
2. Corporate subsidies: a moving target that produces very different per-person numbers
Estimates for annual federal spending that could be labeled “corporate subsidies” differ dramatically because studies use different scopes: narrow definitions count direct grants and farm supports, while broader definitions add tax expenditures, loan guarantees, government businesses, and indirect industry support. A recent calculation cited in the materials puts annual corporate-welfare spending near $181 billion a year, summing direct subsidies, indirect support, and government business activity, which implies a per-capita tax burden in the low hundreds when divided across the U.S. population [3]. Older studies and media summaries have offered much larger per-family figures (for example, a $6,000-per-family claim appears in some sources) or smaller ones (e.g., $700 or $4,000 in various social posts), demonstrating wide variance driven by definition and time period rather than a single authoritative number [1] [5].
3. Why apples-to-apples comparisons fail — different denominators, definitions, and years
Comparing a single-year, per-taxpayer SNAP figure from 2012 to a separate, loosely defined corporate-subsidy figure mismatches units and assumptions. SNAP calculations often divide program outlays by taxable income-earners or households to get a per-taxpayer share; corporate-welfare calculations may divide cumulative program totals, multi-year projections, or tax-expenditure estimates by the total population or taxable households. The materials show analysts flagging these methodological gaps: social-media posts that juxtapose $36 for SNAP with thousands for corporate subsidies typically lack necessary detail on income thresholds, household composition, and what counts as a subsidy [4] [1]. Without harmonizing definitions and years, the two numbers cannot be reliably compared to support the original claim.
4. Recent studies and critiques show both programs are consequential — but context changes policy debates
Contemporary analyses emphasize that SNAP serves tens of millions and cost tens of billions in recent years, while corporate-welfare studies stress that substantial federal resources flow to specific industries like agriculture, energy, and transportation, and that legislation since 2021 expanded some industry-targeted supports [2] [3]. Both strands of evidence support the broader factual claim that taxpayers fund social safety-net programs and corporate supports, but they diverge on scale and distribution: SNAP payments concentrate benefits to low-income households, whereas corporate subsidies often concentrate large amounts among a small number of corporations and sectors, affecting who receives benefits and the political economy of subsidy allocation [5] [6]. These distinctions matter for policy debates about equity, efficiency, and budget priorities.
5. Bottom line: the headline numbers are misleading; the reality is nuanced and time-sensitive
The specific claim in its headline form is misleading: the $36 SNAP figure reflects a dated per-taxpayer calculation and can be defensible only with precise qualifiers, while the $700 corporate-subsidy figure lacks consistent documentary support among the supplied sources and is contradicted by other estimates that are both larger and smaller depending on definitions and time frames [1] [3] [6]. The supplied materials demonstrate that accurate comparison requires matching years, choosing a single definition of “subsidy,” and stating whether figures are per-taxpayer, per-household, or per-capita; absent that, the claim functions as a rhetorical contrast rather than a robust empirical statement.